
Armchair General Reader ChallengeArmchair General | March 08, 2006 | Single Page | 2 comments | Print | E-mail
–Matthew Macchiaroli, via email, selected China’s Mao Zhedong The greatest conqueror of all time is not Alexander or Napoleon, but Mao Zhedong, the revolutionary fighter in China. Mao Zhedong’s greatness begins as a young peasant who in a country of millions strived for a better life. While Alexander the Great was the son of a great king and had many luxuries, Mao Zhedong had to fight for the benefit of basics like the ability to read and write, and his drive would be shown again and again on the battlefield. As Mao got older he immersed himself in literature, especially the works of Communist Karl Marx. Mao, like every great general, learned that if he could get the support of his people he could defeat any enemy that opposed him. Mao’s extraordinary tactics and ability to militarize the people all made him the greatest conqueror of all time. Mao’s basic tactics that won him many wars was guerrilla tactics. Mao was not the first conqueror to use guerrilla tactics but he perfected them and his model would be used time after time by other commanders. In his book, On Guerrilla War, Mao talks extensively about his revolutionary tactics that could defeat empires much more powerful than China. At the time, China was a nation that was made up of about 400 million people and was divided by the Communists, Nationalists and the Japanese Empire. Mao fought these much more powerful foes by calling on and militarizing the common Chinese peasant. There were plenty of them to serve China. His weak peasant armies would be "like fish in the sea," for they would live side by side and be protected by the very people they were fighting to free. The peasant forces would fight the highly equipped enemy armies by not engaging them conventionally but by attacking the enemies’ rear and other lightly defended areas. This way the peasants could neutralize the powerful enemies’ strengths of technology by using stealth and speed. Slowly, while his men gained more experience and weapons, they could defeat the enemy in more conventional ways, but still attack in lightly protected areas. These tactics let Mao defeat armies composed of much more highly equipped and trained soldiers. While many other conquerors are counted great because of the land they annexed, Mao conquered something much greater than dirt – he conquered the soul and mind of the Chinese citizen. By freeing the people from landowner debts and using propaganda, Mao turned many of the 400 million Chinese to his side. If this is not greater than merely conquering land then what is? Mao gave his people an image, an image of a united China that was prosperous. Mao did not keep all of his promises, but by gathering the people to his side, he did defeat the very violent Japanese Imperialists and the corrupt Chinese Nationalists. Mao Zhedong is the forgotten general who holds the title of Greatest Conqueror. [continued on next page] Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.
|
|
|
|
||
What is Armchair General?Armchair General (ACG) and ACG online feature a unique, interactive editorial approach that invites the reader to decide the course of action in challenging historical scenarios, to step into the shoes of a battlefield commander. Leading historians and contributors lend integrity and credibility to this fresh presentation of historical and contemporary events. Armchair General is the INTERACTIVE history magazine where YOU COMMAND and decide the course of action! |
What We Write About
|
Our Other Magazines |
Weider History Network: HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | GameSquad |Achtung Panzer! Copyright © 2004-2010 Armchair General L.L.C., All rights reserved. |
||
2 Comments to “Armchair General Reader Challenge”
Wow! I really enjoyed reading this article on Hannibal. Thanks for the time and research!
By Xzuric on Apr 27, 2009 at 3:52 pm
I like all the articles except the one on Hannibal. What Hannibal does not have in common with those other four positions was that Hannibal did not defeat his greatest enemies. Although in Italy for 15 years, he was stuck there and despite his three greatest victories over Rome, the Romans were still fighting. Hannibal didn’t win his war. Napoleon, on the other hand, fought many wars and constantly forced his rivalries to admit defeat. This is about the greatest conquerors and Hannibal did not conquer.
By SupAll on Jun 6, 2009 at 5:08 pm