Armchair General small spacer
Armchair General magazine mastheadGo to Weider History GroupSubscribe to Armchair General MagazineLearn about latest issue of Armchair General

Ancient Generals: Themistocles: Master of Deception

Barry Strauss | June 16, 2005  | 0 comments  | Print  | E-mail

Themistocles’ ancient victory at Salamis can teach modern commanders how to use deception to win.

Subscribe Today

"All war is deception," said Sun Tzu, the ancient Chinese sage. He was correct, but deception comes in various forms. Deception at its boldest and most dynamic is carried out directly under the enemy’s eyes. One might say that the United States pulled off such a deception against Iraq in March 2003. Saddam Hussein knew that the Americans were coming, but he did not know how or when.

About 2,500 years ago, a Greek commander executed what might be the most perfect case of deception in the history of warfare. He was cunning and cocky, but above all, he was successful because he knew how to use human intelligence. This brilliant Greek commander was Themistocles of Athens, and the date was 480 B.C.


Greek oarsmen may have rowed naked and were usually poor citizens or foreigners who could not afford hoplite armor. Only infrequently were slaves used. During campaign, triremes hugged the shoreline and crews disembarked to prepare meals. Since most Greeks could swim, the hoplites who served on board as marines often chose to dispense with their armor to better their chances in the water if their ship went down. Image Credit: Warrior 27, Greek Hoplite, 480-323 BC, by Adam Hook © Osprey Publishing, www.ospreypublishing.com 

At Salamis, the Greeks’ backs were against the wall. Their Persian enemy possessed an armada about twice the size of their own fleet – 700 Persian ships versus 368 Greek ships. Adding to the drama, a battle was shaping up within sight of the Athenian Acropolis and in full view of the Persian King Xerxes.

A month previously, the Persians had shattered Greek resistance in central Greece at the battle of Thermopylae. There, Xerxes’ hordes destroyed the tiny Greek force that was led by King Leonidas of Sparta. Leonidas and his 300 Spartans fought to the last man rather than surrender.


Most of the Persians in Xerxes’ navy could not swim well. Therefore, the Persians recruited other peoples to serve as marines. One such group, the Saka, lived in the middle reaches of the Oxus River. Aethopian marines, enlisted from among the Nubians who traded up and down the Nile River, were also frequent members of the Persian navy. Image Credit: DM/ACG

After this victory, the Persians headed for Athens. Knowing they could not stop the enemy, the Athenians evacuated the entire civilian population. The Athenian navy, joined by its Greek allies, rallied at Salamis, an island just over a mile away from the Athenian coast. Although outnumbered, the Greeks at Salamis somehow had to defeat the Persians; otherwise, nothing could stop the enemy from conquering all of Greece.

The Greeks needed a force multiplier, and Themistocles gave them just that. He devised a plan to use intelligence to trick the enemy. Looking back at Thermopylae, Themistocles might have reasoned that the secret to Persia’s victory had been finding a Greek traitor to guide them over rough terrain. Would they try this again at Salamis? Themistocles thought they would, and for good reason.

The Greeks had scored an intelligence coup a month before Salamis when they captured several of Persia’s top naval officers. Before being shipped off to prison in chains, the men were interrogated. Although no one knows what the prisoners actually said, one can speculate that it was enough to reveal Persia’s plan to find another Greek turncoat – at least it was enough for the shrewd Themistocles. Instead of underestimating his opponent or being overwhelmed by his enemy’s numbers, Themistocles took the trouble to understand what made the Persians tick.


Triremes were the finest warships of their era. In addition to employment as fighting galleys, triremes also transported horses and men. As a horse transport, about 60 oarsmen occupied the upper bench while the rest of the vessel was filled with as many as 30 horses. As a troop transport, a trireme could carry a total of about 200, including the crewmen. Image Credit: GP/ACG

Pages: 1 2

Post a Comment

Please note that Armchair General Staff cannot respond to requests for research of any type. Please visit our research forum to post research questions. If you have a question about our magazine, please use the contact us form.

Related Articles



Armchair General Spacer

SPONSORED SITES




Armchair General Spacer

OPINION POLL

Q: Which of these two conquerors do you rate as the greatest?

View Results

See previous polls

STAY CONNECTED WITH US

RSS Feed
 
Daily Armchair General Update
 
 

Armchair General on Twitter Armchair General on Myspace Armchair General on Facebook

What is Armchair General?

Armchair General (ACG) and ACG online feature a unique, interactive editorial approach that invites the reader to decide the course of action in challenging historical scenarios, to step into the shoes of a battlefield commander. Leading historians and contributors lend integrity and credibility to this fresh presentation of historical and contemporary events.

Armchair General is the INTERACTIVE history magazine where YOU COMMAND and decide the course of action!

Armchair General's Feedburner Link Get our RSS!
Weider History Group Newsletter Newsletter Signup

What We Write About

Our Other Magazines

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer!

Copyright © 2004-2008 Armchair General L.L.C., All rights reserved.