Pages Menu
TwitterRssFacebookYouTube

Categories Menu

Posted on Jan 28, 2015 in Front Page Features, War College

Taking Aim at the Sniper Myth

Taking Aim at the Sniper Myth

By Peter Suciu

US Army (USA) Specialists (SPC) Chantha Bun (foreground) armed with a Accuracy Engineering tactical sniper rifle, equipped with an AN/PVS-10 Day+Night Vision Sniper Scope, and USA Sergeant Anthony Davis (background), armed with a 7.62mm M21 sniper rifle, scan for enemy activity at 4 West, an Iraqi Police station located in Mosul, Iraq, following an attack by insurgents during Operation IRAQI FREEDOM. (Bravo Company snipers, 1st Battalion, 24th Infantry Regiment, 1st Brigade, 25th Infantry Division, Stryker Brigade Combat Team; photo by Army Sgt. Jeremiah Johnson.)

With the release of the Clint Eastwood-directed film American Sniper, based on the book by Chris Kyle, a growing debate on the role of military snipers has begun. Documentary filmmaker Michael Moore weighed in on the issue via social media stating that as he was taught that snipers are cowards and would shoot people in the back.

Subscribe Today

Moore, who posted the comments on Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Day, quickly backpedaled on his statement and suggested that he wasn’t actually referencing Kyle or the film. Moore did note that his uncle was killed while serving in the United States military during World War II, and claimed that it was a sniper who killed his uncle—while also suggesting that Dr. King was also the victim of a sniper.

In the days that followed a controversy grew, with many in Hollywood, the mainstream media and social media taking sides. The issue became whether snipers are indeed “cowards” and whether their actions are ever justified.

Sniper vs. Assassin
One point that should be immediately clarified is that sniper should not be used in a general sense to identify anyone who picks up a gun and shoots at someone else from concealment. Mister Moore, who was contacted through his publicist for this article but did not respond, has (as noted) claimed that his uncle was “killed by a sniper.”

Marines return fire on Japanese snipers who opened up on their positions from across a valley in the mountains of Bougainville. The trench allows Marines to crawl from one dugout to another. (National Archives)

Marines return fire on Japanese snipers who opened up on their positions from across a valley in the mountains of Bougainville. The trench allows Marines to crawl from one dugout to another. (National Archives)

With all due respect to his uncle, who did give his life while serving his country, Moore has presented no actual proof that said uncle was indeed “killed by a sniper.” (Moore has said his uncle, Lawrence Moore, was a US Army paratrooper who was “killed by a Japanese sniper” in February 1945—Editor) The Japanese didn’t exactly “play by the rules” in their treatment of prisoners or in the way they waged war, yet Moore’s anger is directed at a supposed sniper and seems to harbor no ill will at the enemy in general.

At the same time Moore attempted to suggest that James Earl Ray, the confessed killer of Dr. King, was also a sniper. This suggests that there is a total lack of understanding as to what exactly a sniper is and is not.

Ray did serve in the military in World War II, but was not, according to any published document, a “sniper,” nor was he known to be a particularly experienced marksman. The same can be said of Lee Harvey Oswald, the assassin of President John F. Kennedy. Oswald has at times been labeled a sniper. It is true that he served in the United States Marine Corps in the 1950s. During that time the Corps had three levels of shooting ability.

According to his Marine score card, Oswald was tested twice. The first time in December 1956 after “a very intensive 3 weeks’ training period” according to Warren Commission Hearings, Oswald scored 212: two marks above the minimum for a “sharpshooter;” while in May 1959 he scored 191, just above the minimum for a “marksman.” Both scores are well below the score of 220 required for someone to earn the classification of an expert.

In other words Oswald would never be sniper-worthy by military standards. Yet, Oswald and Ray are often misidentified as snipers, which really has sadly played into the myth of snipers. As Marin Pegler, author of The Military Sniper Since 1914, noted “Today, ‘sniper’ is used indiscriminately by the media to refer to almost anyone who uses a rifle. This causal inaccuracy does the trained sniper a huge disservice; only a very few men and women have the unique blend of skills that will qualify them as snipers.”

The cowardly acts committed by men such as Oswald and Ray thus shouldn’t be lumped with the art of sniping practiced by skilled military professionals.

The Snipe and the Origins of Snipers
It is unclear who actually coined the term “snipers” but it came from “snipe shooting.” One story tells that the snipe is a small, fast-flying game bird found in the marshes of England and Scotland. It is known for its agility and twisted flight that make it very difficult to shoot. In the era of flintlock fowling guns it was considered quite an accomplishment to bring down the snipe.

Another story tells that this bird was hunted in British-controlled India during the 18th century, where the concept of “sniper” was used to describe someone who was a skilful hunter, a first-rate shot with the ability to stalk his quarry.

Either way the idea of “sniper” was born.

The true sniper only arrived on the battlefield with the advent of rifling, the cutting of spiral grooves into the inside of a barrel. This imparted spin to the projectile and increased accuracy. It was clearly a superior weapon to smoothbore muskets of the 17th and 18th century.

It came at a disadvantage to these early “riflemen” serving in the militaries of Europe and on the American colonists’ side in the American Revolution, however. While a skilled soldier could load and fire three to four rounds per minute with a musket the rifle was far slower to reload. This meant soldiers had to pick their targets carefully because it would be a longer time to get another chance.

Author Adrian Gilber (Sniper: The World of Combat Sniping)¸wrote “The introduction of greased paper wrapped round the ball made the process faster, but the difficulties of muzzle loading were never satisfactory overcome until the arrival of the Minié bullet in the mid-nineteenth century.”

Early Sharpshooters
Even before there were actual “snipers” on the battlefield there were “sharpshooters,” and these men came to prominence during the American Revolution (1775-83). A few companies of Americans were armed with slender, long-barreled, small-caliber flintlocks commonly called Pennsylvania or Kentucky rifles, and they were experienced marksmen.

These American long rifles had a practical range of some 300 yards, compared to the British muskets, which were effective to 200 yards at best. Though the number of American rebels armed with long rifles was always small—they were incompatible with the hand-to-hand combat that generally determined victory on the 18th-century battlefield—marksmen firing from cover used their longer range to “take out” enemy officers, which the Europeans considered improper behavior. Pegler noted in his book that, “On one occasion George Washington appeared within range of a British rifleman, who was instructed not to shoot, as it was not the business of common soldiers to target their social betters.”

Another story has been told that a British rifleman asked the Duke of Wellington on the morning of the Battle of Waterloo in 1815 if he “could have a go at Napoleon.” Again the answer was absolutely not. Sniping was not part of the British way of doing things, it seems.

That changed dramatically in the century that followed after the Napoleonic Wars. British adventures around the world showed the benefits of using every tool at their disposal when confronting the enemy. The machinegun was used against tribal enemies, for example, but sniping came into its own when the professional British Army faced the Boers in the Second Anglo-Boer War (1899-1902).

'California Joe,' a famed member of Berdan's Sharpshooters, as depicted in Harper's Weekly. Library of Congress

‘California Joe,’ a famed member of Berdan’s Sharpshooters, as depicted in Harper’s Weekly. Library of Congress

The Americans continued to appreciate the role that sharpshooters could play, and during the Civil War Hiram Berdan—long regarded as the top rifle marksman in America—convinced the Union Army to recruit marksmen for two regiments of sharpshooters. Each recruit had to pass a rigid shooting test before being accepted. The Confederates, too, had their own specialized sharpshooter units, proving that military leaders saw a need for skilled shooters who could take down a target from a great distance. Union General John Sedgewick, commander of the Sixth Corps, was killed by a sharpshooter at Spotsylvania shortly after chiding his men that the enemy “couldn’t hit an elephant at this distance.”

As rifle development continued, the preferred weapon of marksmen evolved from a slow, muzzle-loading rifle to a quick-firing, bolt-action rifle. Additionally, the creation of improved optical sights allowed for greater accuracy at longer ranges. The first optical scopes were used in hunting rifles before the military issued actual “sniper rifles.”

Snipers in the Trenches
While sharpshooters had become a crucial part of the military in the 19th century the sniper truly joined the ranks during the First World War. It is easy to think about the role the machine gun and artillery barrages played in war, but it was during this time that the role of the sniper truly evolved.

As the lines became static each side looked at ways to not only break through but also to harass the enemy, and that is where snipers had a very valid role to play. The Germans had an early upper hand.

A US Marine Corps sniper, 1st Battalion, 8th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Division, looks through a hole in a wall from the top of a building for suspicious insurgent activity in Fallujah, Al Anbar Province, Iraq, while participating in a Security and Stabilization Operation during Operation IRAQI FREEDOM. (Photo by Lance Cpl. Trevor R. Gift)

A US Marine Corps sniper, 1st Battalion, 8th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Division, looks through a hole in a wall from the top of a building for suspicious insurgent activity in Fallujah, Al Anbar Province, Iraq, while participating in a Security and Stabilization Operation during Operation IRAQI FREEDOM. (Photo by Lance Cpl. Trevor R. Gift)

Peglar noted that “One British sniper officer reckoned that exposing any part of the body for more than three seconds would result in a shot from a German sniper, and they had no shortage of targets.” Those new to the trenches simply couldn’t understand how deadly a sniper was, and Pegler cites a report that in 1915 on any given day a single battalion in a quiet sector could lose 12 to 18 men to German snipers. The superstition that it is bad luck to light three cigarettes from a single match came about because keeping a match flaming that long in the trenches tended to draw sniper fire.

The British soon responded by training men to be snipers. However, as noted, sniping is far more than just picking up a rifle with a scope on it. The British military planners found that many good target shooters were not up to the task. While these men could shoot to kill, they weren’t up to the task of stalking and being patient—skills and mentality necessary to being a true sniper.

The most successful British snipers during the war were small game hunters, gamekeepers and deerstalkers. The best snipers were also found in the Commonwealth ranks, with men coming from the more rugged lands of Canada, Australia and South Africa.

The issue of whether a sniper was a “coward” is one for extended conjecture.

Gilbert noted, “The moral repugnance felt in striking down a soldier in cold blood stayed some men’s hands, but such feelings were alien to the true sniper.”

There was also the fact that snipers were typically despised by the enemy and seldom respected. Gilbert also wrote, “That over-accurate German sniping would have brought retaliatory British artillery fire,” and he added, “For the determined sniper, the prospect of enemy retaliation and the curses of one’s comrades were overridden by the thrill of the hunt.”

Many German World War I snipers used scopes on their Gewehr 98s, some of the most effective sniper rifles of the war. (Gregory Proch)

Many German World War I snipers used scopes on their Gewehr 98s, some of the most effective sniper rifles of the war. (Gregory Proch)

The Sniper Since World War I
As the first truly modern war, the First World War resulted in a rapid advance in military technology that saw the adoption of the tank, aircraft, and body armor, including the use of steel helmets. The role of the sniper was also better understood, even if it created many of those aforementioned myths.

Today the true sniper is specially trained, which often involves working as part of a team. Whether alone or with a spotter the sniper is often isolated and in a constant state of danger from the enemy; snipers are seldom allowed to surrender, so instead of being cowards these are men (and women) who should be seen as brave for the role they have chosen to play.

Some may think that snipers don’t play fair. Snipers often have chosen targets in quiet areas, but the point of the sniper is not to cause the most casualties but rather to affect the morale of the troops; that hasn’t changed since the American Revolution and those long rifles. If one can’t feel safe behind the lines, then one can’t feel safe anywhere—and for that reason, as well as taking out high-value targets, the sniper continues to play an important role on the modern battlefield.

As Peglar wrote in concluding his book, “the amount of research and development time being devoted to (sniper weapons) is perhaps a sign that sniping has finally been recognized as a necessary and vital battlefield function. One thing is certain: that on the battlefield of the future it will not be possible to hide from the sniper.”

About the Author
Peter Suciu has been collecting militaria and playing military simulations since he was a child. He’s been reviewing computer games for nearly 20 years, and when he’s not waging battle from his desktop he is a business reporter for several magazines and websites. His work has appeared on CNBC.com, Fortune.com and Forbes. He also collects military helmets and runs the MilitarySunHelmets.com website.

7 Comments

  1. Snipers are a highly skilled military operative. They usually work alone, or with a spotter. Both must have highly developed woodcraft skill and be able to shoot and move confusing the enemy. Oswald and Ray were assassins and as noted in the article needed to shoot a whole lot better. One of the members of my boot camp platoon fired a 240 on the range and when we graduated he had orders to report to Quantico Base Weapons Battalion to train as a sniper.

  2. A snipers’ observational expertise shouldn’t be underestimated – see following story:
    At one point of a supposed disused trench, a cat was observed sunning itself. This was duly reported by the observant sniper, and in his log book for three or four days running came a note of this tortoise-shell cat sunning itself, always at the same spot.
    The Intelligence and Sniping Officer of the battalion, on reading his entries, made his deduction, that the cat probably lived near by. Now at that part of the British line there was a terrible plague of rats which was probably at least as troublesome upon the German side. So our officer deduced that the cat was a luxury, and that this being so, it had most certainly been commandeered or annexed by enemy officers and probably lived in some enemy officer’s headquarters—possibly a company commander’s dugout.
    Some aeroplane photographs were next taken and studied, with a result that an enemy headquarters was discovered, located and duly dealt with by one of the batteries of howitzers which made a speciality of such shoots.

  3. MOS 0317, Scout Sniper
    The Scout Sniper is a Marine skilled in field craft and
    marksmanship who delivers long range, precision fire on
    selected targets from concealed positions in support of
    combat operations.

    They have a secondary mission of gathering information
    for intelligence purposes. They participate in activities
    designed to deny the enemy freedom of movement by targeting
    enemy leaders,Crew-Served Weapons Operators, radiomen,
    observers, messengers, and other key personnel with
    precision fire.

    Scout Snipers engage vital material targets such as
    command and control equipment, light armored vehicles,
    air defense radar, and missile launchers that require
    precision rifle fire to neutralize.
    Scout Snipers also conduct close reconnaissance and
    surveillance operations for the infantry battalion in
    support of the intelligence section.

  4. My grandfather was almost killed by a German sniper during World War I. If not for my grandfather looking up at the last second I would not be writing this. He was leading his platoon down a road during the Battle of the Somme when he notice a glint off the sniper’s rifle. Instead of taking the bullet in the brain he was shot in the mouth.

    My grandfather harbored no ill will towards the sniper. He felt the sniper was doing his jobs as he was trained to do it. After World War II, he went to Germany to help them rebuild. The Germans were grateful for his efforts. He even helped one woman come to the United States to start a new life.

    Hatred for snipers ran so deep that it carries a death sentence. Being caught with a scope on a rifle would get that soldier killed even if he/she was surrendering.

  5. The term “sharpshooter” was not used prior to the Civil War. It was a term labeled to those who shot the Sharps rifle that was used in that conflict. The rifle was a breachloader known for its accuracy and those that used the rifle became known as “Sharpshooters”. This is a term that we have retained to this date to refer to anyone with excellent shooting skills.

    • Sorry, Chuck, but it is a popular myth that “sharpshooter” came from those who used Sharps rifles. Webster’s New Encyclopedic Dictionary gives 1802 as the year the term was first used, and you can find it in the ORs in reports from Civil War commanders that predate the adoption of the Sharps.

  6. One interesting fact I only learned relatively recently, is that in the typical two man sniper team, the spotter–who usually sights the target, and calculates range and windage, is the superior; i.e., one must prove one’s worth as the shooter, then graduate to spotter. My impression is that getting the range and windage correct is the harder part; if they are correct a good shooter, after adjusting his sight, will likely not miss. (I am no expert: if I am wrong here, any and all please correct away!)

Leave a Reply to Robert Murphy Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>