| |

Tactics 101 033 – Obstacle PlanningRick Baillergeon and John Sutherland | December 18, 2008 | 0 comments | Print | E-mail In regards to overall intent, the commander should detail how he envisions obstacles contributing to his success. He should discuss how obstacles will be synchronized with his other resources (particularly indirect and direct fire systems) to assist in accomplishing his mission. This intent will drive all other planning. The second critical piece of guidance is the specific effects he desires his obstacles to attain. As we stressed in our last article this is crucial in emplacing obstacles. It is the effect that is essentially the blueprint for how obstacles will look on the battlefield. The work done in Step 1: Mission Analysis sets the conditions to determining which effect or effects are needed during the defense: disrupt, fix, turn, and block. As a review:
The determination of the effect also begins to lay out the specific requirements in relation to the amount of obstacles needed. This is because each effect, based on analysis, requires a different amount of resources to achieve. For example, if you remember in our last article, the block effect is the most demanding and thus, requires more resources to emplace. On the other hand, the disrupt effect is not as demanding and consequently, involves less resources to emplace than block. With this guidance in hand (and in head), we can begin to formulate where we want to emplace obstacles to achieve the desired intent and effects. Step 3 – Obstacle Locations and Types (Unconstrained) Step 4 – Determine Priorities
With the above and other factors, you will prioritize your unconstrained list. There are numerous techniques you can utilize to prioritize. Two of the most common follow: First, you may use a simple numerical ranking of your obstacles. In this case, your most important obstacle would be ranked number 1; your second most important obstacle to be emplaced is ranked number two, and so on. Second, you may employ a categorical system of prioritization. In this technique, you may label obstacles as “must have,” “have,” and “nice to haves.” Thus, you have three defined categories for the future emplacement of obstacles. Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Tags: 20th-21st century warfare, Military History, Scholarship
|
|
|
|
||
What is Armchair General?Armchair General (ACG) and ACG online feature a unique, interactive editorial approach that invites the reader to decide the course of action in challenging historical scenarios, to step into the shoes of a battlefield commander. Leading historians and contributors lend integrity and credibility to this fresh presentation of historical and contemporary events. Armchair General is the INTERACTIVE history magazine where YOU COMMAND and decide the course of action! |
What We Write About
|
Our Other Magazines |
Weider History Network: HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer! Copyright © 2004-2008 Armchair General L.L.C., All rights reserved. |
||