| |

Tactics 101: 027. Commander’s IntentRick Baillergeon and John Sutherland | June 13, 2008 | 2 comments | Print | E-mail COMMANDER’S INTENT – IT’S A PERSONAL THING Perhaps British Field Marshal William Slim, one of World War II’s greatest leaders said it best regarding the topic. He stated: Commander’s Intent (WHAT IT IS):
Commander’s Intent (WHAT IT IS NOT): Commander’s Intent is not a template found in an SOP book. It is not a Course of Action (COA) nor is it tied to a specific COA. The method is the Concept of the Operation. Risk is addressed in Commander’s Guidance and in each COA developed NEXT MONTH
|
|
|
|
||
What is Armchair General?Armchair General (ACG) and ACG online feature a unique, interactive editorial approach that invites the reader to decide the course of action in challenging historical scenarios, to step into the shoes of a battlefield commander. Leading historians and contributors lend integrity and credibility to this fresh presentation of historical and contemporary events. Armchair General is the INTERACTIVE history magazine where YOU COMMAND and decide the course of action! |
What We Write About
|
Our Other Magazines |
Weider History Network: HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer! Copyright © 2004-2008 Armchair General L.L.C., All rights reserved. |
||
2 Comments to “Tactics 101: 027. Commander’s Intent”
The first bullet point in the intent should be eliminated, as what forces are in our path is of “special interests” not ours.
Last thing we need is to grabbing ourselves because we are up against the Republican or Special Republican Guard.
Great article otherwise!
By Kylen Haseneohrl on Jul 26, 2008 at 3:03 pm
Re commander’s intent: nice to see that this surprisingly modern management concept, which is over a hundred years old, is getting the wide acceptance it deserves.
I have a couple of questions, though!
First question: How is ‘commander’s intent’ different from ‘mission’? Cannot /shouldn’t it be integrated?
Second question: if in your example on page 2 there had been two instead of one scout sergeant, positioned on the opposite flanks of the battalion’s advance and they had both assessed the situation and radioed in to remedy the advance but towards their own (respective) positions, how would that situation be resolved? Company commander who receives the radio call decides, battalion decides?
By MajorSennef on Feb 14, 2009 at 7:27 am