Armchair General small spacer
Armchair General magazine masthead

Special Report from Afghanistan: A Strategic Threat

By Pat Proctor | War College |  Published: November 08, 2012 at 12:21 pm

The Tangi Valley is a stubbornly violent insurgent safe-haven connecting Wardak and Logar Provinces. It was in this valley in August 2011 that 38 people – including 22 Navy Seals and seven Afghan commandos – were killed when their helicopter was shot by a rocket-propelled grenade (RPG) as they attempted to reinforce Army Rangers pinned down in the valley below. It was the greatest loss of U.S. troops in a single incident since the beginning of the war. The Taliban don’t stay in the Tangi Valley, either. On September 11, 2011, the tenth anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, Taliban insurgents from the Tangi Valley attacked Combat Outpost (COP) Sayed Abad – about 12 kilometers from the Tangi Valley along Highway 1, the vital artery connecting Kabul to Kandahar. The insurgents used a truck-bomb larger than the one that destroyed the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City in 1995. Seventy-seven U.S. service members were wounded and four Afghan civilians, including a three-year-old girl, were killed.

Subscribe Today

On September 29, 2012, a platoon from Task Force Bayonet (173d Airborne Brigade) left COP Sayed Abad for a fateful patrol to the Tangi Valley that would shake the partnership between the U.S.-led coalition and the Afghan National Army (ANA) to its core.

The 16-man anti-tank platoon was headed for an ANA checkpoint at the mouth of the Tangi Valley to conduct biometrics – taking the fingerprints of civilians passing through the checkpoint, looking for insurgents. When the platoon arrived at the checkpoint, they found six Afghan soldiers manning the post, stopping cars, checking for suspicious activity. As the platoon set up their equipment and began operations, the atmosphere was cordial. An Afghan soldier offered the platoon’s Afghan interpreter chai (hot tea) and candies. Along with the platoon’s interpreter, the platoon sergeant, four American soldiers, and a civilian law enforcement professional (LEP, a retired American cop working with soldiers in Afghanistan) were dismounted at the checkpoint. The U.S. and Afghan soldiers joked about the last time the Americans had visited the checkpoint; they had been attacked by insurgents from deeper inside the Tangi Valley.

After 45 minutes, the atmosphere suddenly turned. Two Afghan soldiers raised their weapons and fired, instantly killing the platoon sergeant and the law enforcement professional. Three more soldiers were wounded before the gunner for the M249 (squad automatic weapon or SAW) and the platoon leader, firing from the passenger seat of his nearby vehicle, silenced the Afghan attackers. As more U.S. soldiers rushed to the scene to treat the wounded, the platoon took more fire from a compound a few dozen feet away; they responded by clearing the compound with rifles and grenades. As they tried to load up and evacuate their casualties, the platoon took more fire, this time from insurgents deeper in the Tangi Valley. As the platoon departed the checkpoint, about 90 minutes after they had arrived, two Americans and two Afghan soldiers were dead and three U.S. soldiers and four Afghan soldiers were wounded (two of these Afghans would later die of their wounds). Sgt. 1st Class Daniel Metcalfe, the slain platoon sergeant, was the 52d American killed this year in an insider attack and the 2,000th American service member killed in Afghanistan since the beginning of the war.

As of yet, no explanation for the attack has been found. There was no cultural affront that sparked the incident. Several of the Afghan soldiers involved were from northern, non-Pashtun provinces, their families beyond the reach of Taliban intimidation. It is as if this evil reached out from the Tangi Valley and infected these men’s souls.

The Afghan National Army has reluctantly admitted that the engagement was initiated by Afghan soldiers, and has pledged to take action to identify future insider threats before they can attack. But they must act fast. The American public is quickly losing patience.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S. Government.

Lt.Col. Pat Proctor is currently deployed to eastern Afghanistan, serving as the chief of plans for the 1st Infantry Division. He is a veteran of both the Iraq and Afghan wars and the author of Task Force Patriot and the End of Combat Operations in Iraq. He is also a doctoral candidate in history at Kansas State University.



Armchair General Spacer

Recommended

Tags: , ,

6 Responses to “Special Report from Afghanistan: A Strategic Threat”


  1. 1
    Viper26 says:

    Do we know what ANA unit it was? Can it be narrowed down to Corps, BDE, and Kandak?

  2. 2
    Mark says:

    Regarding: “There was no cultural affront that sparked the incident.”

    Would it matter if there was? Are we supposed to accept such actions as excusable if the perpetrators were culturally offended? [Rhetorical questions not aimed at the author but rather at the high priests of "soccer ball COIN" who have been preaching that essentially everything that goes wrong in wretchedly poor, hopelessly violent failed states is somehow all our fault.]

    I think we all know why this is happening – a successful campaign by elements of the Taliban to expel Western forces from the country by accelerating the evaporation of Western public support for the stability/security/COIN/whatever-it-is-being-called-at-the-moment efforts there.

    From the the very beginning of the shift away from destroying al Qaida and toward nation-building in Afghanistan, I have been shaking my head. Even if the West manages to turn Afghanistan into Kansas, so normal and boring that ten people drop dead every day from sheer boredom, it will not do significant, permanent damage to al Qaida or its affiliates. The enemies’ fates are not tied to that of Afghanistan. The scope of the overall mission there is far too wide.

    • 2.1
      Pete says:

      So called “nation building” (known by many other names including “reconstruction and stabilization” “conflict prevention” et al within the “interagency”) is COIN!!!! It is right to expect the ANA to overlook some western clumsiness culturally, but it is also “meet and right” to expect greater “understanding” from our “boots on the ground” until they shoot, then they aren’t ANA and are fair game!!

  3. 3
    Pat Proctor says:

    Viper,

    The unit was, I believe, 1st Company, 4th Kandak, 4th BDE, 203rd Corps.

    Mark,

    I agree with everything you said–except running down Kansas. I live there :)

    I simply mention the lack of a cultural affront because this is the typical explanation Afghan officials provide as to why this is happening.

  4. 4
    Erik Mar says:

    Maybe they just don’t like military occupations, whether they’re culturally sympathetic or not. After all, we wouldn’t accept one; we even have an entire genre of fantasy movies where we defend the homeland against foreign invaders (remember, for example the ludicrous and soon to be remade “Red Dawn” where Nicaraguans, who presumably hitchhiked their way up here, take over the country.)
    We don’t even accept other countries establishing military bases on our soil, even though we seem to think that we have some inalienable right to everyone else’s soil for our bases.
    It’s not at all confusing that people would opt for the relatively stable and well-paying jobs with the army or police, while resenting and chafing against the invaders who are trying to set up those selfsame proxy forces.

  5. 5
    Viper26 says:

    @ Pat – Interesting, if I remember correctly thats the recon company. Funny that they would be being used as static security, but not surprising given that every ANA soldier I have ever met besides Medics want, claim, and try to be Infantry instead of their MOS.

    @Mark – Dead on target, except that Pete is correct in that “Nation building” is COIN. He is correct to a point. But the inference that Nation Building includes converting their political system to democracy is part of the problem. These people are NOT Democratic, at least not in the outback, and they never will be in any forseeable future. TRUE COIN involves working WITHIN the tribal system, not trying to change it to meet our sensibilities. If change will come, it will come of it’s own accord, not tied to our help or as a condition.

    Best example I have seen to show others who have not been there is an essay called “One Tribe at a Time” by MAJ Jim Gant.

    HE gets it.



Leave a Reply

Related Articles


Armchair General Spacer Armchair General Spacer
ARMCHAIR GENERAL POLL 

Q: Which of these WW 2 turretless tank destroyers would you prefer to take into combat?

View Results | See previous polls

STAY CONNECTED WITH US 
RSS Feed Daily Email Updates
Armchair General Spacer Armchair General Spacer
What is Armchair General?

Armchair General is the INTERACTIVE history magazine where YOU COMMAND and decide the course of action!

Armchair General (ACG) and ACG online feature a unique, interactive editorial approach that invites the reader to decide the course of action in challenging historical scenarios, to step into the shoes of a battlefield commander. Leading historians and contributors lend integrity and credibility to this fresh presentation of historical and contemporary events.

Armchair General's Feedburner Link Get our RSS!
Weider History Group Newsletter Newsletter Signup

What We Write About
Our Other Magazines

Weider History Network:  Armchair General | HistoryNet | Achtung Panzer!
Today in History | Picture of the Day | Daily History Quiz | Military History Forums

Copyright © 2004-2012 Armchair General L.L.C., All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Contact Us | Advertise With Us | Subscription Help