Some Recommended Reading
By Carlo D'Este

Published Wednesday, December 05, 2007  | Print  | E-mail

I am often asked what books inspired me to become a military historian. My response is that three books by three different authors motivated me to follow in their footsteps. Each is outstanding for two very essential reasons: a great subject and terrific narrative. All have been in print for many years yet remain models of their subject and belong on everyone’s reading list. In no particular order they are: The Guns of August, by Barbara Tuchman, The Bitter Woods, by John S.D. Eisenhower and The Patton Papers, edited by Martin Blumenson.

***

Guns of August

This is narrative history at its very best and besides becoming an international bestseller it also won a well-deserved Pulitzer Prize. Its influence was far reaching. While grappling with the Cuban missile crisis, President John F. Kennedy read it. His daughter, Caroline has said: “He encouraged the members of his cabinet to read The Guns of August, Barbara Tuchman’s history of the misjudgments that led to the First World War, in order that American leaders would never be in the same position” as Germany’s foreign minister who, after the war had ended at a cost of 20 million lives, was asked: “How did it all happen?” He replied, “Ah, if only we knew.” Tuchman’s book also had a powerful effect on British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan, a veteran of the Western Front.

In an age when the shelf life of a hardback book is usually measured in weeks, The Guns of August is still in print after forty-five years. In my opinion, the vast majority of the many books written since 1962 about World War I fall under the shadow of this magnificent work.

***

The Bitter Woods

On December 16, 1944, in an all-out gamble to compel the Allies to sue for peace, Hitler ordered the only major German counteroffensive of the war in northwest Europe by three armies (more than a quarter-million troops). Its objective was to split the Allied armies by means of a surprise blitzkrieg thrust through the rugged, heavily forested Ardennes to Antwerp, marking a repeat of what the Germans had done twice previously — in August 1914 and May 1940. Despite Germany’s historical penchant for mounting counteroffensives when things looked darkest, Gen. Omar Bradley miscalculated and left the Ardennes lightly defended by only two inexperienced and two battered American divisions. The result was the largest single battle ever fought by the United States Army by more than a million G.I.s.

The once-quiet Ardennes became bedlam as American units were caught flat-footed and fought desperate battles to stem the German advance at St. Vith, Elsenborn Ridge, Houffalize and later, Bastogne, where the 101st Airborne Division was surrounded, its commander issuing a one-word refusal to surrender that has become a symbol of defiance: “Nuts!” As the German armies drove deeper into the Ardennes in an attempt to quickly secure vital bridgeheads west of the River Meuse, the line defining the Allied front on the map took on the appearance of a large protrusion or bulge, the name by which the battle would forever be known.

[continued on next page]