<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Red Storm Rising or Passing Shower?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.armchairgeneral.com/red-storm-rising-or-passing-shower.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.armchairgeneral.com/red-storm-rising-or-passing-shower.htm</link>
	<description>All things military history!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:05:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: WongHoongHooi</title>
		<link>http://www.armchairgeneral.com/red-storm-rising-or-passing-shower.htm/comment-page-1#comment-7693</link>
		<dc:creator>WongHoongHooi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 02:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.armchairgeneral.com/?p=4536#comment-7693</guid>
		<description>Arguably, the former USSR was not a &#039;true&#039; superpower in military terms because it couldn&#039;t project its power far beyond its land frontiers - 1. logistics and 2. lack of credible tac air cover for amphibious ops or re-supplyagainst the kind of opposition that strong regional air forces might have been able to mount, never mind U.S. carrier aviation.

Nevertheless, if NATO expands to Russia&#039;s borders, these &#039;frontline&#039; states will next agitate for NATO/U.S. tripwire forces and that, in turn, will require contingency planning for rapid reinforcement and so the commitment will grow. Thus Russia only needs to be a strong regional power to be more or less permanently on NATO&#039;s/ US&#039;s radar once again, like in the old days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arguably, the former USSR was not a &#8216;true&#8217; superpower in military terms because it couldn&#8217;t project its power far beyond its land frontiers &#8211; 1. logistics and 2. lack of credible tac air cover for amphibious ops or re-supplyagainst the kind of opposition that strong regional air forces might have been able to mount, never mind U.S. carrier aviation.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, if NATO expands to Russia&#8217;s borders, these &#8216;frontline&#8217; states will next agitate for NATO/U.S. tripwire forces and that, in turn, will require contingency planning for rapid reinforcement and so the commitment will grow. Thus Russia only needs to be a strong regional power to be more or less permanently on NATO&#8217;s/ US&#8217;s radar once again, like in the old days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Chadwick</title>
		<link>http://www.armchairgeneral.com/red-storm-rising-or-passing-shower.htm/comment-page-1#comment-6652</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Chadwick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 20:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.armchairgeneral.com/?p=4536#comment-6652</guid>
		<description>&quot;Have you read anything to suggest Russia can truly become a 
superpower again?&quot;


Nope.

Everything is pretty much working against their re-emergence 
as a super power. Demographics, economics, politics, you name it. 
Rusia had a brief power surge when the price of oil peaked and it 
suddenly, unexpectedly (and temporarily) found its pockets 
litterally stuffed with cash. Now that oil has tanked again, it&#039;s 
back in the shadows, and all the long-term lines for it seem to be 
trending down, not up. Even the next rie in oil prices will do litle 
more than give it another short-term cash transfusion. The long-
term fundamentals aren&#039;t changing, asfar as I can see.

Could it turn thing around? You bet. But I don&#039;t see any evidence 
that the current political leadership has any interest in the 
fundamental reorganization of its economy that is required. 

Maybe someone else who watches Russia closer than I do has seen 
something I haven&#039;t?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Have you read anything to suggest Russia can truly become a<br />
superpower again?&#8221;</p>
<p>Nope.</p>
<p>Everything is pretty much working against their re-emergence<br />
as a super power. Demographics, economics, politics, you name it.<br />
Rusia had a brief power surge when the price of oil peaked and it<br />
suddenly, unexpectedly (and temporarily) found its pockets<br />
litterally stuffed with cash. Now that oil has tanked again, it&#8217;s<br />
back in the shadows, and all the long-term lines for it seem to be<br />
trending down, not up. Even the next rie in oil prices will do litle<br />
more than give it another short-term cash transfusion. The long-<br />
term fundamentals aren&#8217;t changing, asfar as I can see.</p>
<p>Could it turn thing around? You bet. But I don&#8217;t see any evidence<br />
that the current political leadership has any interest in the<br />
fundamental reorganization of its economy that is required. </p>
<p>Maybe someone else who watches Russia closer than I do has seen<br />
something I haven&#8217;t?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microbe</title>
		<link>http://www.armchairgeneral.com/red-storm-rising-or-passing-shower.htm/comment-page-1#comment-6638</link>
		<dc:creator>Microbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.armchairgeneral.com/?p=4536#comment-6638</guid>
		<description>The West dismisses ‘Russia’ with predictable arrogance. 

Anyway – what or where is “Russia” nowadays? 

Okay; the great, amorphous Soviet Union is dissipated from a 
former massive conglomerate land-massed empire chuck-full of 
incredible shared European history. Today She appears to be 
coalescing once more into a new ‘conglomerate online empiric 
database’ that looks to outdo anything ‘US Microsoft ever did’. 
E.g. I for one in my dotage glance, with available monies to 
invest, favourably toward ‘the lovely delights of St. Petersburg’ 
for more substantial returns. –

Don’t you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The West dismisses ‘Russia’ with predictable arrogance. </p>
<p>Anyway – what or where is “Russia” nowadays? </p>
<p>Okay; the great, amorphous Soviet Union is dissipated from a<br />
former massive conglomerate land-massed empire chuck-full of<br />
incredible shared European history. Today She appears to be<br />
coalescing once more into a new ‘conglomerate online empiric<br />
database’ that looks to outdo anything ‘US Microsoft ever did’.<br />
E.g. I for one in my dotage glance, with available monies to<br />
invest, favourably toward ‘the lovely delights of St. Petersburg’<br />
for more substantial returns. –</p>
<p>Don’t you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

