<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: November 2008 Issue: Patton vs. Rommel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.armchairgeneral.com/november-2008-issue-patton-vs-rommel.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.armchairgeneral.com/november-2008-issue-patton-vs-rommel.htm</link>
	<description>All things military history!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:45:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Colby Lossing</title>
		<link>http://www.armchairgeneral.com/november-2008-issue-patton-vs-rommel.htm/comment-page-1#comment-7987</link>
		<dc:creator>Colby Lossing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.armchairgeneral.com/november-2008-acg.htm#comment-7987</guid>
		<description>If you must know why we Americans disregard Montgomery as mediocre general it is because his victory over Rommel is blown out of proportions. Given Rommel&#039;s logistical situation I&#039;m surprised he even got as far as El-Alamein and on top of that Montgomery had a significant numerical superiority  to Rommel whom given the circumstances compiled an impressive set of victories. My second point would have to be the pointless waste of 17,000 both American and British lives in the doomed Operation Market Garden give Patton&#039;s significant proximity to the Heart of the German Reich at this point in the war yet, Eisenhower&#039;s refusal to grant him the fuel to finish the war quicker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you must know why we Americans disregard Montgomery as mediocre general it is because his victory over Rommel is blown out of proportions. Given Rommel&#8217;s logistical situation I&#8217;m surprised he even got as far as El-Alamein and on top of that Montgomery had a significant numerical superiority  to Rommel whom given the circumstances compiled an impressive set of victories. My second point would have to be the pointless waste of 17,000 both American and British lives in the doomed Operation Market Garden give Patton&#8217;s significant proximity to the Heart of the German Reich at this point in the war yet, Eisenhower&#8217;s refusal to grant him the fuel to finish the war quicker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Volume V: Armchair General Magazine &#187; Armchair General</title>
		<link>http://www.armchairgeneral.com/november-2008-issue-patton-vs-rommel.htm/comment-page-1#comment-7796</link>
		<dc:creator>Volume V: Armchair General Magazine &#187; Armchair General</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.armchairgeneral.com/november-2008-acg.htm#comment-7796</guid>
		<description>[...] November 2008 Reader Survey [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] November 2008 Reader Survey [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Langley</title>
		<link>http://www.armchairgeneral.com/november-2008-issue-patton-vs-rommel.htm/comment-page-1#comment-6738</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Langley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 23:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.armchairgeneral.com/november-2008-acg.htm#comment-6738</guid>
		<description>Re Carlo D’Este’s article which compared two supposed military 
geniuses, Patton and Rommel, I confess that I continue to be 
baffled by this endless American fixation with Rommel.

This article is no different. As usual, Rommel receives fulsome 
praise for his spectacular defeats of Eighth Army forces in Africa. 
No mention was made of Rommel’s even more spectacular series 
of defeats after General Montgomery took command of the Eighth 
Army.

This turnabout appears to have destroyed some kind of American 
dream and resulted in nothing but American bitterness, 
resentment and denigration directed towards both General 
Montgomery and to the Eighth Army, &#039;slow&#039; according to 
Americans, whose post battle pursuit of Rommel from Alamein to 
Benghazi, a distance of 670 miles, took 17 days and only halted 
for reasons relating to logistics. That&#039;s over 39 miles per day for 
17 days. Does anyone know of any other advance in military 
history that went so far and so fast?

Is my assessment correct? Did Americans, then and now, really 
wish that Rommel had continued his victorious way against their 
Eighth Army &#039;allies&#039;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re Carlo D’Este’s article which compared two supposed military<br />
geniuses, Patton and Rommel, I confess that I continue to be<br />
baffled by this endless American fixation with Rommel.</p>
<p>This article is no different. As usual, Rommel receives fulsome<br />
praise for his spectacular defeats of Eighth Army forces in Africa.<br />
No mention was made of Rommel’s even more spectacular series<br />
of defeats after General Montgomery took command of the Eighth<br />
Army.</p>
<p>This turnabout appears to have destroyed some kind of American<br />
dream and resulted in nothing but American bitterness,<br />
resentment and denigration directed towards both General<br />
Montgomery and to the Eighth Army, &#8217;slow&#8217; according to<br />
Americans, whose post battle pursuit of Rommel from Alamein to<br />
Benghazi, a distance of 670 miles, took 17 days and only halted<br />
for reasons relating to logistics. That&#8217;s over 39 miles per day for<br />
17 days. Does anyone know of any other advance in military<br />
history that went so far and so fast?</p>
<p>Is my assessment correct? Did Americans, then and now, really<br />
wish that Rommel had continued his victorious way against their<br />
Eighth Army &#8216;allies&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale Placides</title>
		<link>http://www.armchairgeneral.com/november-2008-issue-patton-vs-rommel.htm/comment-page-1#comment-6673</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale Placides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 23:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.armchairgeneral.com/november-2008-acg.htm#comment-6673</guid>
		<description>Dear Editor:
     As a loyal subscriber to Armchair General, I find the each magazine issue 
most interesting, however I&#039;ve commented once before as to why no stories or 
articles ever appear about the Philippine American War, fought after the close 
of the Spanish American War and lasting for almost 4 years?    A relative who 
was a non commissioned officer was killed on the Islands in 1902.   Letters 
from our relative indicated that it was a long drawn out bloody war leaving over 
4,000 American GI&#039;s killed.   Is there a reason why there is little written about 
this forgotten and disgraceful war.   It reminded many people of the Iraq war 
which should of not have been fought.  The Philippine American war was 
thought by many American GI&#039;s at the time that it was an unnecessary war as 
well.   Hoping for a response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Editor:<br />
     As a loyal subscriber to Armchair General, I find the each magazine issue<br />
most interesting, however I&#8217;ve commented once before as to why no stories or<br />
articles ever appear about the Philippine American War, fought after the close<br />
of the Spanish American War and lasting for almost 4 years?    A relative who<br />
was a non commissioned officer was killed on the Islands in 1902.   Letters<br />
from our relative indicated that it was a long drawn out bloody war leaving over<br />
4,000 American GI&#8217;s killed.   Is there a reason why there is little written about<br />
this forgotten and disgraceful war.   It reminded many people of the Iraq war<br />
which should of not have been fought.  The Philippine American war was<br />
thought by many American GI&#8217;s at the time that it was an unnecessary war as<br />
well.   Hoping for a response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Weitz</title>
		<link>http://www.armchairgeneral.com/november-2008-issue-patton-vs-rommel.htm/comment-page-1#comment-6445</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Weitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 13:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.armchairgeneral.com/november-2008-acg.htm#comment-6445</guid>
		<description>There is a strong probability that members of my family were slain in one of the Katyn Forest massacres.  My family were Jews living near Lemberg in Galicia, and my father had a cousin who was a vetenarian with the Polish cavalry.  After the fall of Poland he escaped thru Romania to North Africa where he was killed near Tobruk.  He did, however, write our family a letter that the men of the Polish branch had been murdered by the Russians after the invasion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a strong probability that members of my family were slain in one of the Katyn Forest massacres.  My family were Jews living near Lemberg in Galicia, and my father had a cousin who was a vetenarian with the Polish cavalry.  After the fall of Poland he escaped thru Romania to North Africa where he was killed near Tobruk.  He did, however, write our family a letter that the men of the Polish branch had been murdered by the Russians after the invasion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
