<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Napoleon Total War PC Game: An Armchair General Preview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.armchairgeneral.com/napoleon-total-war-pc-game-an-armchair-general-preview.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.armchairgeneral.com/napoleon-total-war-pc-game-an-armchair-general-preview.htm</link>
	<description>All things military history!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:05:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gazfun</title>
		<link>http://www.armchairgeneral.com/napoleon-total-war-pc-game-an-armchair-general-preview.htm/comment-page-1#comment-12537</link>
		<dc:creator>Gazfun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 05:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.armchairgeneral.com/?p=6298#comment-12537</guid>
		<description>Having a look at the picture, how can the rear columm fire through friendly troops, its not logical</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having a look at the picture, how can the rear columm fire through friendly troops, its not logical</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferry</title>
		<link>http://www.armchairgeneral.com/napoleon-total-war-pc-game-an-armchair-general-preview.htm/comment-page-1#comment-10795</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 19:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.armchairgeneral.com/?p=6298#comment-10795</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, most gamers who have shelved out their money for ETW can&#039;t forget that debacle. And I&#039;m not to proud to admit I&#039;m the same here. Our distrust(as perhaps the intention to state by honestabe) comes from the fact that ETW was hailed by your collegues at large as a great game while in fact it was.... much less then that to be honest. And let&#039;s be honest, it works mostly that way in the reviewindustry.. I wash your back, you wash mine. 

Back to the actual game:

Fortunately, NTW seems to be stable on my system. It looks a bit nicer to the eye. Put in the long awaited MP. On that note I must say the possibility to get a live opponent in your campaign sounds good, haven&#039;t checked that out, experience anyone??? And streamlined some diplomatic options.
Indeed, NTW looks like what ETW should have been but on the same note also a lot less. 

To me it seems they cut out the parts they couldn&#039;t fix(wich is still significant i&#039;m afraid) from ETW, spit-shined the graphics, put in a new storyline(as the title suggests, napoleon&#039;s story) and re-released it. It certainly doesn&#039;t add much new things to the genre. Campaing AI wise it looks like its running a bit smoother but still a lot of small stacks and till now, I&#039;ve not been invaded(playing GC as GB. So far BAI wise it isn&#039;t smarter but I must say a bit smoother... can&#039;t put my finger to that, it just feels like it. And with not smarter I mean... it still doesn&#039;t surprise me. I haven&#039;t tried out the fort battles so can&#039;t comment on that either(developed the habbit of avoiding those in ETW ;) )
Technologywise it is cramped too, less to invent, some too much in the future(ships screws and ironclads, my god) while on the other hand others aren&#039;t included(platoon fire, various ammo&#039;s etc etc). Still no direct way to influence home politics.

This is certainly not all but just a tip of the iceberg. Am I overly harsh? Perhaps I am but on the other hand, CA also promissed a lot with ETW. Even in the sequel(wich didn&#039;t take them longer than 1 year to develop while abandoning ETW) doesn&#039;t make good to those promisses. Can one actually judge a game without taking its predecessor in account? 

All in all, I would give this game a 7 based on where it came from. If ETW didn&#039;t happen, I would give it a 8.5. But it did and that&#039;s why I can&#039;t judge it a step forward. But at least on my machine, it&#039;s stable and thus playable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, most gamers who have shelved out their money for ETW can&#8217;t forget that debacle. And I&#8217;m not to proud to admit I&#8217;m the same here. Our distrust(as perhaps the intention to state by honestabe) comes from the fact that ETW was hailed by your collegues at large as a great game while in fact it was&#8230;. much less then that to be honest. And let&#8217;s be honest, it works mostly that way in the reviewindustry.. I wash your back, you wash mine. </p>
<p>Back to the actual game:</p>
<p>Fortunately, NTW seems to be stable on my system. It looks a bit nicer to the eye. Put in the long awaited MP. On that note I must say the possibility to get a live opponent in your campaign sounds good, haven&#8217;t checked that out, experience anyone??? And streamlined some diplomatic options.<br />
Indeed, NTW looks like what ETW should have been but on the same note also a lot less. </p>
<p>To me it seems they cut out the parts they couldn&#8217;t fix(wich is still significant i&#8217;m afraid) from ETW, spit-shined the graphics, put in a new storyline(as the title suggests, napoleon&#8217;s story) and re-released it. It certainly doesn&#8217;t add much new things to the genre. Campaing AI wise it looks like its running a bit smoother but still a lot of small stacks and till now, I&#8217;ve not been invaded(playing GC as GB. So far BAI wise it isn&#8217;t smarter but I must say a bit smoother&#8230; can&#8217;t put my finger to that, it just feels like it. And with not smarter I mean&#8230; it still doesn&#8217;t surprise me. I haven&#8217;t tried out the fort battles so can&#8217;t comment on that either(developed the habbit of avoiding those in ETW ;) )<br />
Technologywise it is cramped too, less to invent, some too much in the future(ships screws and ironclads, my god) while on the other hand others aren&#8217;t included(platoon fire, various ammo&#8217;s etc etc). Still no direct way to influence home politics.</p>
<p>This is certainly not all but just a tip of the iceberg. Am I overly harsh? Perhaps I am but on the other hand, CA also promissed a lot with ETW. Even in the sequel(wich didn&#8217;t take them longer than 1 year to develop while abandoning ETW) doesn&#8217;t make good to those promisses. Can one actually judge a game without taking its predecessor in account? </p>
<p>All in all, I would give this game a 7 based on where it came from. If ETW didn&#8217;t happen, I would give it a 8.5. But it did and that&#8217;s why I can&#8217;t judge it a step forward. But at least on my machine, it&#8217;s stable and thus playable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald D. Swick</title>
		<link>http://www.armchairgeneral.com/napoleon-total-war-pc-game-an-armchair-general-preview.htm/comment-page-1#comment-10514</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald D. Swick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.armchairgeneral.com/?p=6298#comment-10514</guid>
		<description>For the record, ArmchairGeneral.com does not permit companies to &quot;buy&quot; the opinion of our writers. Gamers who have actually seen and played advance copies of Napoleon Total War seem to have been universally impressed while reserving final judgement for the game&#039;s release.

http://www.gamingheaven.net/gamingreviews.php?reviewid=864
one game a strategy fan should not miss, it is shaping up to be one of the best games in 2010.

http://www.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/napoleontotalwar/news.html?sid=6240618&amp;mode=previews&amp;page=2
Napoleon seems like it&#039;ll have plenty to offer both new and veteran Total War fans in the form of improved AI, a totally new campaign style, and a highly unusual multiplayer feature.

http://www.gameplanet.co.nz/pc/games/159664/previews/134364.Napoleon-Total-War/
As a pre-Beta build, the game we played has its share of curiosities, missing assets and known issues – but that’s to be expected. What’s important is the superior gameplay and polish that Napoleon is exhibiting. Already, Napoleon looks set to be the game that Empire could have been.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record, ArmchairGeneral.com does not permit companies to &#8220;buy&#8221; the opinion of our writers. Gamers who have actually seen and played advance copies of Napoleon Total War seem to have been universally impressed while reserving final judgement for the game&#8217;s release.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gamingheaven.net/gamingreviews.php?reviewid=864" rel="nofollow">http://www.gamingheaven.net/gamingreviews.php?reviewid=864</a><br />
one game a strategy fan should not miss, it is shaping up to be one of the best games in 2010.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/napoleontotalwar/news.html?sid=6240618&#038;mode=previews&#038;page=2" rel="nofollow">http://www.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/napoleontotalwar/news.html?sid=6240618&#038;mode=previews&#038;page=2</a><br />
Napoleon seems like it&#8217;ll have plenty to offer both new and veteran Total War fans in the form of improved AI, a totally new campaign style, and a highly unusual multiplayer feature.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gameplanet.co.nz/pc/games/159664/previews/134364.Napoleon-Total-War/" rel="nofollow">http://www.gameplanet.co.nz/pc/games/159664/previews/134364.Napoleon-Total-War/</a><br />
As a pre-Beta build, the game we played has its share of curiosities, missing assets and known issues – but that’s to be expected. What’s important is the superior gameplay and polish that Napoleon is exhibiting. Already, Napoleon looks set to be the game that Empire could have been.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: honestabe</title>
		<link>http://www.armchairgeneral.com/napoleon-total-war-pc-game-an-armchair-general-preview.htm/comment-page-1#comment-10467</link>
		<dc:creator>honestabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.armchairgeneral.com/?p=6298#comment-10467</guid>
		<description>I wonder how much they paid him to write this article? CA &amp; SEGA can&#039;t be on good terms with most consumers after the ETW fiasco and rubbish game delivery. Now they want us to shell out money again to them for more rubbish? lmao Only fools fall for the same trick more than once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how much they paid him to write this article? CA &amp; SEGA can&#8217;t be on good terms with most consumers after the ETW fiasco and rubbish game delivery. Now they want us to shell out money again to them for more rubbish? lmao Only fools fall for the same trick more than once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald D. Swick</title>
		<link>http://www.armchairgeneral.com/napoleon-total-war-pc-game-an-armchair-general-preview.htm/comment-page-1#comment-10269</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald D. Swick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.armchairgeneral.com/?p=6298#comment-10269</guid>
		<description>The screenshots were provided by SEGA/Creative Arts, Greve, to give gamers an idea of what they can expect in terms of graphics. ACG will also review the published game later and post additional screenshots sent by that reviewer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The screenshots were provided by SEGA/Creative Arts, Greve, to give gamers an idea of what they can expect in terms of graphics. ACG will also review the published game later and post additional screenshots sent by that reviewer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greve</title>
		<link>http://www.armchairgeneral.com/napoleon-total-war-pc-game-an-armchair-general-preview.htm/comment-page-1#comment-10236</link>
		<dc:creator>Greve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 19:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.armchairgeneral.com/?p=6298#comment-10236</guid>
		<description>Excellent preview!
Are those screenshots of the battles multiplayer or singleplayer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent preview!<br />
Are those screenshots of the battles multiplayer or singleplayer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Napoleon Total War Computer Game Preview &#171; HMGS-MidSouth</title>
		<link>http://www.armchairgeneral.com/napoleon-total-war-pc-game-an-armchair-general-preview.htm/comment-page-1#comment-10217</link>
		<dc:creator>Napoleon Total War Computer Game Preview &#171; HMGS-MidSouth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 00:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.armchairgeneral.com/?p=6298#comment-10217</guid>
		<description>[...] I just posted to Armchair General a preview of the Napoleon Total War game that&#8217;s coming out from Creative Assembly and SEGA. You&#8217;ve gotta see these screenshots, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I just posted to Armchair General a preview of the Napoleon Total War game that&#8217;s coming out from Creative Assembly and SEGA. You&#8217;ve gotta see these screenshots, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

