<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monty: World War II&#8217;s Most Misunderstood General, Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.armchairgeneral.com/monty-world-war-iis-most-misunderstood-general.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.armchairgeneral.com/monty-world-war-iis-most-misunderstood-general.htm</link>
	<description>All things military history!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:45:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Broad Front versus Narrow Front: Who was Right? - Page 3</title>
		<link>http://www.armchairgeneral.com/monty-world-war-iis-most-misunderstood-general.htm/comment-page-1#comment-8650</link>
		<dc:creator>Broad Front versus Narrow Front: Who was Right? - Page 3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 01:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.armchairgeneral.com/?p=2240#comment-8650</guid>
		<description>[...] Originally Posted by dalem   Of course I can. And I do. I find his ability to build up and motivate an army to be first rate, and his ability to use it in the field to be abysmal.    Well, you haven&#039;t given your evidence for this assertion at all, Dale. If it&#039;s just based on unrepentant critics like Martin Blumenson, or a fanboi like Nigel Hamilton, it&#039;s useless. A more balanced approach to this controversial figure is here:  Armchair General Magazine - We Put YOU in Command! Monty: World War II&#8217;s Most Misunderstood Ge... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Originally Posted by dalem   Of course I can. And I do. I find his ability to build up and motivate an army to be first rate, and his ability to use it in the field to be abysmal.    Well, you haven&#8217;t given your evidence for this assertion at all, Dale. If it&#8217;s just based on unrepentant critics like Martin Blumenson, or a fanboi like Nigel Hamilton, it&#8217;s useless. A more balanced approach to this controversial figure is here:  Armchair General Magazine &#8211; We Put YOU in Command! Monty: World War II&#8217;s Most Misunderstood Ge&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikel</title>
		<link>http://www.armchairgeneral.com/monty-world-war-iis-most-misunderstood-general.htm/comment-page-1#comment-7980</link>
		<dc:creator>mikel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.armchairgeneral.com/?p=2240#comment-7980</guid>
		<description>Montgomery demonstrated the insececurity of a short man at almost every opportunity .While choosing in Africa to build up a public persona , Rommel&#039;s legend is strictly accomplishment based .While seeking out ways to annoy superiors , he demanded unconditional obediance from subordinates .Eisenhower&#039;s task was far above anything a Montgomery could have accomplished because of his insecurities .He wasn&#039;t interested in getting the job done , but claiming the creadit for it was his aim as well as denying that credit to others .A small man in many ways , very similar to Patton and McCarthur . Average generals not in the catagory of a Rommel or a Zukov</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Montgomery demonstrated the insececurity of a short man at almost every opportunity .While choosing in Africa to build up a public persona , Rommel&#8217;s legend is strictly accomplishment based .While seeking out ways to annoy superiors , he demanded unconditional obediance from subordinates .Eisenhower&#8217;s task was far above anything a Montgomery could have accomplished because of his insecurities .He wasn&#8217;t interested in getting the job done , but claiming the creadit for it was his aim as well as denying that credit to others .A small man in many ways , very similar to Patton and McCarthur . Average generals not in the catagory of a Rommel or a Zukov</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
