<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monty: World War II&#8217;s Most Misunderstood General, Part 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.armchairgeneral.com/monty-world-war-iis-most-misunderstood-general-part-iii.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.armchairgeneral.com/monty-world-war-iis-most-misunderstood-general-part-iii.htm</link>
	<description>All things military history!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:05:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike In Phx</title>
		<link>http://www.armchairgeneral.com/monty-world-war-iis-most-misunderstood-general-part-iii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-23285</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike In Phx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 17:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.armchairgeneral.com/?p=2293#comment-23285</guid>
		<description>Carlo D&#039;Este wrote this? Mr. D’Este is a person whose work I continue to view as one of the standards of USA layman’s military history. Yet this work, “Monty: World War II’s Most Misunderstood General”, isn’t even remotely of such a quality. My words to follow are critical of Mr. D’Este’s effort…but frankly, am far more critical of the editor who chose to allow this to go to print. Essentially, Editor, what were you thinking? The topic of Monty’s career is certainly worthy of thought. And engaging Mr. D’Este to share his thoughts on the matter is without question a valuable addition to Armchair General’s body of work…so, one must ask, other than the title, Editor, where might you point to such a discussion? Mr. D’Este effort might well be published, but for Pete’s sake, change the title….</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carlo D&#8217;Este wrote this? Mr. D’Este is a person whose work I continue to view as one of the standards of USA layman’s military history. Yet this work, “Monty: World War II’s Most Misunderstood General”, isn’t even remotely of such a quality. My words to follow are critical of Mr. D’Este’s effort…but frankly, am far more critical of the editor who chose to allow this to go to print. Essentially, Editor, what were you thinking? The topic of Monty’s career is certainly worthy of thought. And engaging Mr. D’Este to share his thoughts on the matter is without question a valuable addition to Armchair General’s body of work…so, one must ask, other than the title, Editor, where might you point to such a discussion? Mr. D’Este effort might well be published, but for Pete’s sake, change the title….</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

