Armchair General small spacer
Armchair General magazine mastheadGo to Weider History GroupSubscribe to Armchair General MagazineLearn about latest issue of Armchair General

Guest POV – The Siege of Ulsan

Joshua Gilbert | March 12, 2009  | one comment  | Print  | E-mail

However, on February 5th, following a failed Korean assault which strained relations with the Joseon, a peace missive arrived from Kato. The allied leaders were now assured that conditions must be even worse then they seemed, and the testimony of Japanese captives confirmed it. But Yang did not accept; he wanted to force Kato to surrender not to negotiate.

Subscribe Today

But the allied camp was not in much better shape. As the Japanese discovered, the besiegers were also getting low on food, but they were confident supplies could hold out until Ulsan fell. On February 8th it all turned out for naught when the advance forces of Mori Hidemoto’s naval squadron arrived on the banks of the Taehe River and swept the Ming holding force aside.

Yang Hao was thrown into panic and consulted his generals. Joseon court minister Yi Tokhyang advised leaving a small force behind to keep Ulsan surrounded while moving off with the bulk of the allied army to keep the Japanese from landing. But Yang was concerned that Kato Kiyomasa could break through in such conditions and did not move. When reports arrived that nearly 60,000 Japanese troops had landed, Yang Hao bolted for Seoul, fearing destruction. The allied army broke down, and the combined forces of Mori and Kato nearly crushed the allies between them.

The siege of Ulsan was over. But in the end the Japanese victory was bittersweet; it did nothing to change the ultimate course of the war. The Japanese withdrew from Korea within months, on orders from the ailing dictator Toyotomi Hideyoshi, and the allied triumph was sealed by the naval victory at Noryang Point.

My question is: The Siege of Ulsan was a "very close run thing," and the Japanese victory was never assured. As Yang Hao, what would you do differently? Please give two examples below.

Pages: 1 2

Tags:

  1. One Comment to “Guest POV – The Siege of Ulsan”

  2. Based on the history presented here, Yang Hao committed several grave errors that turned a potential victory into defeat. The first error was insufficient scouting of the surrounding area during the days of the initial assault. During a siege you have two fronts to mind; the inward one and the outward one. Kato Kiyomasa’s successful gaining of the element of surprise on his arrival indicates that Yang Hao likely did not deploy and scout with both of these fronts in mind. Only after Kato Kiyomasa had already gotten in with critical supplies does it sound like Yang started to take the outward front seriously. Without those supplies for the Japanese and the morale boost of their leader’s presence, the entire siege would likely have ended quite swiftly.

    The second major blunder was the refusal to negotiate with the starving Japanese garrison. Perhaps this was due to the personal enmity against Kato Kiyomasa, but it was clear that Yang Hao had lost sight of the objective: capture Ulsan. Sun Tzu wrote ‘A surrounded army must be given a way out.’ The previous blunders had led to a situation where continuing the siege was risky in terms of the attacking armies supplies, troop morale, and even of fending off continued relief efforts from outside Japanese forces. Yang Hao should have negotiated, and offered the Japanese the chance to leave Ulsan on their own. If this had been done, perhaps there would have been enough time to claim the fortifications and change the outcome of Mori Hidemoto’s arrival.

    By Bruce Maclean on Apr 9, 2009 at 6:03 pm

Post a Comment

Please note that Armchair General Staff cannot respond to requests for research of any type. Please visit our research forum to post research questions. If you have a question about our magazine, please use the contact us form.

Related Articles




Armchair General Spacer

SPONSORED SITES




Armchair General Spacer

OPINION POLL

Q: Which of these two conquerors do you rate as the greatest?

View Results

See previous polls

STAY CONNECTED WITH US

RSS Feed
 
Daily Armchair General Update
 
 

Armchair General on Twitter Armchair General on Myspace Armchair General on Facebook

What is Armchair General?

Armchair General (ACG) and ACG online feature a unique, interactive editorial approach that invites the reader to decide the course of action in challenging historical scenarios, to step into the shoes of a battlefield commander. Leading historians and contributors lend integrity and credibility to this fresh presentation of historical and contemporary events.

Armchair General is the INTERACTIVE history magazine where YOU COMMAND and decide the course of action!

Armchair General's Feedburner Link Get our RSS!
Weider History Group Newsletter Newsletter Signup

What We Write About

Our Other Magazines

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer!

Copyright © 2004-2008 Armchair General L.L.C., All rights reserved.