Armchair General small spacer
Armchair General magazine mastheadGo to Weider History GroupSubscribe to Armchair General MagazineLearn about latest issue of Armchair General

Guest POV – The Siege of Ulsan

Joshua Gilbert | March 12, 2009  | one comment  | Print  | E-mail

In terms of impact, the Asian Seven Year’s War or the Imjin War, stands out as one of the most epic conflicts of East Asian history, and remains engraved on the Korean national consciousness. Within that conflict one celebrated chapter is the Siege of Ulsan, conducted in January 1598 during the second phase of the war.

Subscribe Today

Following the initial Japanese success at Namwon, the allied armies of Ming China and Joseon Korea managed to stem the tide, preventing the fall of Seoul. With allied control of the sea secured by the battle of Myongnyang the Japanese were forced to fall back to their fortress line, a perimeter arc stretching 200 kilometers (about 125 miles) from Sunch’on to Ulsan. This occurred in autumn 1597.

The allied leadership resolved to break the Japanese defenses by a three-pronged assault that winter. The titular leader of the allied forces, the Ming general Yang Hao, took personal command of the prong aimed at Ulsan, and chose his Joseon equivalent, Gwon Yul, as his deputy. On January 14th, 1598, they set out for Ulsan with nearly 45,000 men.

Excluding strategic reasons, the choice of Ulsan for a target was simple. The Japanese commander was Kato Kiyomasa, a dangerously aggressive general with whom both the Chinese and the Koreans had a bone to pick. Ulsan at the time was also unfinished, and the central keep itself was still under construction. On January 29th the allied offensive began in earnest. The assault caught the understrength garrison by surprise, and it was driven back under the press of the allied advance. Within days the garrison was in bad condition, decimated by heavy losses and reduced to starvation and thirst.

But unexpectedly Kato Kiyomasa (who had been away at an outlying camp) returned with a small force and some extra supplies. His sudden appearance shocked the allies, and he furiously broke through their lines into Ulsan. At the same time the garrison made a countercharge from a side gate of the castle. The allied forces, caught off guard by the ferocity of the Japanese resistance, were forced to fall back under heavy fire and give control of the castle itself to Kato, leaving them in control of the outer works.

One samurai at the battle, Okochi Hidemoto, described the garrison’s charge:

“But as friend and foe were all mixed up we could not fire our guns. A soldier who had sallied out and taken a head halfway down the slope had achieved the exploit of yarishita (first to take a head with a spear), then our troops, without the loss of a single man, began to pull back.”

With the first part of the battle over, both sides settled down for a siege. Yang Hao left the running of the siege itself to his able lieutenant, Ma Gui. Ma was fully aware that Ulsan needed to fall quickly, as allied morale was already plummeting. But there were problems. Frozen rain, endemic to Korean winters, had begun to fall, turning the ground into a quagmire. The Ming siege train, already having trouble progressing through the rough countryside, became so lodged in the muck that it played no role in the campaign.

There was also the problem of the Japanese defenders themselves. Kato’s arrival had raised the garrison’s morale, allowing the feared Japanese mastery of muskets to come into play again. The high Japanese rate of fire effectively prevented the allies from reaching the walls of Ulsan unless they were willing to suffer heavy casualties. Ma Gui opted to instead starve the garrison out, branching out his forces into the surrounding area to control the forage and prevent any additional Japanese forces from arriving.

The siege effectively turned into a stalemate. Over the course of the next several days both the allies and the Japanese battered away at each other, suffering horrific casualties on both sides of the lines. The freezing rain continued throughout, adding to the misery. Yang Hao was reduced to ineffective frustration: even after he breached Ulsan’s walls the defenders were still able to resist, despite the appalling conditions. Yang was also concerned by the mounting number of outside Japanese attempts to break through, which forced him to detach more men from the siege force to contain them.

Pages: 1 2

Tags:

  1. One Comment to “Guest POV – The Siege of Ulsan”

  2. Based on the history presented here, Yang Hao committed several grave errors that turned a potential victory into defeat. The first error was insufficient scouting of the surrounding area during the days of the initial assault. During a siege you have two fronts to mind; the inward one and the outward one. Kato Kiyomasa’s successful gaining of the element of surprise on his arrival indicates that Yang Hao likely did not deploy and scout with both of these fronts in mind. Only after Kato Kiyomasa had already gotten in with critical supplies does it sound like Yang started to take the outward front seriously. Without those supplies for the Japanese and the morale boost of their leader’s presence, the entire siege would likely have ended quite swiftly.

    The second major blunder was the refusal to negotiate with the starving Japanese garrison. Perhaps this was due to the personal enmity against Kato Kiyomasa, but it was clear that Yang Hao had lost sight of the objective: capture Ulsan. Sun Tzu wrote ‘A surrounded army must be given a way out.’ The previous blunders had led to a situation where continuing the siege was risky in terms of the attacking armies supplies, troop morale, and even of fending off continued relief efforts from outside Japanese forces. Yang Hao should have negotiated, and offered the Japanese the chance to leave Ulsan on their own. If this had been done, perhaps there would have been enough time to claim the fortifications and change the outcome of Mori Hidemoto’s arrival.

    By Bruce Maclean on Apr 9, 2009 at 6:03 pm

Post a Comment

Please note that Armchair General Staff cannot respond to requests for research of any type. Please visit our research forum to post research questions. If you have a question about our magazine, please use the contact us form.

Related Articles



Armchair General Spacer

SPONSORED SITES




Armchair General Spacer

OPINION POLL

Q: Of the three options presented in ACG's What Next in Afghanistan? article, which offers the greatest hope for success?

View Results

See previous polls

STAY CONNECTED WITH US

RSS Feed
 
Daily Armchair General Update
 
 

Armchair General on Twitter Armchair General on Myspace Armchair General on Facebook

What is Armchair General?

Armchair General (ACG) and ACG online feature a unique, interactive editorial approach that invites the reader to decide the course of action in challenging historical scenarios, to step into the shoes of a battlefield commander. Leading historians and contributors lend integrity and credibility to this fresh presentation of historical and contemporary events.

Armchair General is the INTERACTIVE history magazine where YOU COMMAND and decide the course of action!

Armchair General's Feedburner Link Get our RSS!
Weider History Group Newsletter Newsletter Signup

What We Write About

Our Other Magazines

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer!

Copyright © 2004-2008 Armchair General L.L.C., All rights reserved.