HistoryNet.com RSS
ArmchairGeneral.com RSS

HistoryNet.com Articles
America's Civil War
American History
Aviation History
Civil War Times
Military History
Wild West
World War II

ACG Online
ACG Magazine
Stuff We Like
War College
History News
Tactics 101
Carlo D'Este

ACG Gaming
PC Game Reviews

ACG Network
Contact Us
Our Newsletter
Meet Our Staff
Advertise With Us

Sites We Support
Once A Marine
The Art of Battle
Game Squad
Mil. History Podcast
Russian Army - WW2
Achtung Panzer!
Mil History Online

Go Back   Armchair General and HistoryNet >> The Best Forums in History > Historical Events & Eras > Weapons of War

Notices and Announcements

Weapons of War The machinery of warfare. .

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26 Aug 17, 11:14
Vaeltaja's Avatar
Vaeltaja Vaeltaja is offline
Lieutenant General
ACG 5 Year Service Ribbon Tournament 1 and preceding Mini-Polls 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: -
Posts: 3,526
Vaeltaja has disabled reputation
Originally Posted by Pruitt View Post
There are literally dozens of different rounds for the 105 main gun. They are not all antiarmor. The round is smaller so they can fit more of them in the tank and they are lighter to manhandle. A 120 breechloading mortar could be shoe horned onto a Bradley and it might even fit in a C-130. I don't see Armor Branch going for anything smaller than a 105 on a "tank". Now you might have a chance if you call the vehicle an Assault Gun.
Placing a breechloading 120 mm mortar on Bradley should not be a problem with regards to it fitting in a C-130. Take a look at the NEMO mortar system for an example.
Reply With Quote
Old 29 Aug 17, 02:39
Merkava188's Avatar
Merkava188 Merkava188 is offline
ACG 5 Year Service Ribbon Most Significant/Influential Tank Campaign Most Significant/Influential Fighter Campaign Most Significant/Influential Multi-Role Aircraft C 
Tournament 1 and preceding Mini-Polls 
Real Name: Doug Williams
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Sierra Vista
Posts: 1,070
Merkava188 is on the path to success [1-99] Merkava188 is on the path to success [1-99] Merkava188 is on the path to success [1-99]
If we the U.S. Army goes forward with developing a light tank it should do two things. First call a light tank a light tank not an armored/mobile gun system. Secondly the ability to defeat and kill enemy tanks is an important capability. Let's not forget what happened to the British and Polish airborne troops at Arnhem in September 1944 during Operation Market Garden. In a nutshell give the Airborne something more to kill tanks than Javelin missiles or Humvee mounted Town missles.
Reply With Quote

Please bookmark this thread if you enjoyed it!

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:21.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.