HistoryNet.com RSS
ArmchairGeneral.com RSS

HistoryNet.com Articles
America's Civil War
American History
Aviation History
British Heritage
Civil War Times
MHQ
Military History
Vietnam
Wild West
World War II

ACG Online
ACG Magazine
Stuff We Like
War College
History News
Tactics 101
Carlo D'Este
Books

ACG Gaming
Boardgames
PC Game Reviews

ACG Network
Contact Us
Our Newsletter
Meet Our Staff
Advertise With Us

Sites We Support
HistoryNet.com
Once A Marine
The Art of Battle
Game Squad
Mil. History Podcast
Russian Army - WW2
Achtung Panzer!
Mil History Online

Go Back   Armchair General and HistoryNet >> The Best Forums in History > Historical Events & Eras > World War II

Notices and Announcements

World War II Discuss WW2. .

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 27 May 11, 19:19
ianbudgep51's Avatar
ianbudgep51 ianbudgep51 is offline
Gunnery Sergeant
Canada
 
Real Name: Ian
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 217
ianbudgep51 is on the path to success [1-99] ianbudgep51 is on the path to success [1-99]
Lancaster vs B17

in your opinion, what was the better bomber. no american or british/commonwealth bias please
Reply With Quote
Facebook Connect and Magazine Promotions

World War II Magazine
$26.95

Armchair General Magazine
$26.95
Military History Magazine
$26.95
  #2  
Old 27 May 11, 19:35
redcoat's Avatar
redcoat redcoat is offline
General
UK
5 Year Service Ribbon 
 
Real Name: Michael Thomas
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Stockport Cheshire UK
Posts: 4,700
redcoat is simply cracking [600]
redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600]
Quote:
Originally Posted by ianbudgep51 View Post
in your opinion, what was the better bomber.
They were designed to quite different specifications, one for a day bomber capable of defending itself opposing fighters, while the other was designed to operate in the night bombing role, therefore any direct comparisons are fairly meaningless.

Having said that, both were excellent aircraft.


Quote:
no american or british/commonwealth bias please
Good luck with that one
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 27 May 11, 19:38
Catman's Avatar
Catman Catman is offline
General
United_States
Greatest Blunders Campaign Best Pin-Up Of World War II 
 
Real Name: Monsieur le Chat
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Walkin' to New Orleans
Posts: 4,741
Catman has a spectacular aura about [400]
Catman has a spectacular aura about [400]
I like them both. I'm American of British ancestry. So I guess I'm biased.
__________________
"The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made."
Groucho Marx
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 27 May 11, 19:53
RichardS's Avatar
RichardS RichardS is offline
ACG Forums - Air Marshal
South_Vietnam
Distinguished Service Award 5 Year Service Ribbon ACG Ten Year Service Award March Offensive 
Summer Campaign 100 Greatest Generals, 2008 Most Decisive Battle Campaign, 2008 Greatest/Best Tank of WW2 Campaign 
Greatest Spy Movies Campaign Greatest Blunders Campaign Best Pin-Up Of World War II 
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Coming to a theater near you.
Posts: 15,929
RichardS has achieved enlightenment [1200+] RichardS has achieved enlightenment [1200+] RichardS has achieved enlightenment [1200+] RichardS has achieved enlightenment [1200+] RichardS has achieved enlightenment [1200+]
RichardS has achieved enlightenment [1200+] RichardS has achieved enlightenment [1200+] RichardS has achieved enlightenment [1200+] RichardS has achieved enlightenment [1200+] RichardS has achieved enlightenment [1200+] RichardS has achieved enlightenment [1200+] RichardS has achieved enlightenment [1200+]
Both are wonderful, wonderful aircraft. Not only were they both built to different specifications; but both were designed in different eras. The Lancaster had a larger bomb load and that is a good thing. The 17 could take damage that no other plane could and return. The Axis would have given anything to have either one of the bombers. To pick one; you would need to specify operating environment.





All American just after collision with BF-109


All American after landing.


(images used without permission. No claims made on the images.)
__________________
Eagles may fly; but weasels aren't sucked into jet engines!

"I'm not expendable; I'm not stupid and I'm not going." - Kerr Avon, Blake's 7
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 27 May 11, 20:02
the ace's Avatar
the ace the ace is online now
General
Scotland
5 Year Service Ribbon 
 
Real Name: Andrew
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Perth
Posts: 4,110
the ace is a jewel in the rough [500]
the ace is a jewel in the rough [500] the ace is a jewel in the rough [500] the ace is a jewel in the rough [500] the ace is a jewel in the rough [500] the ace is a jewel in the rough [500] the ace is a jewel in the rough [500] the ace is a jewel in the rough [500] the ace is a jewel in the rough [500]
Except that the Lanc's bomb load was much greater.

The idea behind the B-17 was to obtain a bomber that could carry the same bomb load over a longer range than extant twins.

The Avro Manchester was a medium bomber whose specification demanded that two torpedoes be carried internally. With the failure of the Manchester, the Lancaster inherited a bomb-bay that could lift just about anything, leaving it unmatched as a load carrier.
__________________
"But surely, Mr Salmond, you have a secret agenda ?"

"Oh come on, Kirsty ! It's hardly a secret that Alex Salmond and the Scottish National Party want independence for Scotland."
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 27 May 11, 20:40
redcoat's Avatar
redcoat redcoat is offline
General
UK
5 Year Service Ribbon 
 
Real Name: Michael Thomas
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Stockport Cheshire UK
Posts: 4,700
redcoat is simply cracking [600]
redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600]
Quote:
Originally Posted by the ace View Post
Except that the Lanc's bomb load was much greater..
This was because of the different role of the B-17.
If you stripped out nearly all of the guns and ammo carried by the B-17, its load carrying ability would have been far closer to the Lanc's.

Its just another example of how direct comparisons are useless.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 27 May 11, 20:45
Tsar's Avatar
Tsar Tsar is offline
General of the Forums
Sinc
5 Year Service Ribbon ACG Ten Year Service Award 100 Greatest Generals, 2008 Greatest Spy Movies Campaign 
Greatest Blunders Campaign CWiE 1939-45 Campaign Best Pin-Up Of World War II 
 
Real Name: David
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Where you least expect
Posts: 6,714
Tsar is a jewel in the rough [500]
Tsar is a jewel in the rough [500] Tsar is a jewel in the rough [500] Tsar is a jewel in the rough [500] Tsar is a jewel in the rough [500] Tsar is a jewel in the rough [500] Tsar is a jewel in the rough [500] Tsar is a jewel in the rough [500] Tsar is a jewel in the rough [500]
Quote:
Originally Posted by redcoat View Post
Its just another example of how direct comparisons are useless.
Exactly, both were excellent bombers in the role they did, and both were nearly unmatched in those jobs.
__________________
MountainMan: Political hypocrisy has been alive and well since the first politician emerged from the primordial slime and failed to evolve.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 27 May 11, 21:05
Hop's Avatar
Hop Hop is offline
First Lieutenant
UK
5 Year Service Ribbon 
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 569
Hop has demonstrated strength of character [100] Hop has demonstrated strength of character [100] Hop has demonstrated strength of character [100] Hop has demonstrated strength of character [100] Hop has demonstrated strength of character [100] Hop has demonstrated strength of character [100] Hop has demonstrated strength of character [100] Hop has demonstrated strength of character [100] Hop has demonstrated strength of character [100]
Quote:
If you stripped out nearly all of the guns and ammo carried by the B-17, its load carrying ability would have been far closer to the Lanc's.
The B-17s biggest flaw was the design of the bomb bay. Using common types of bomb the maximum load was only 6,000lbs (12 x 500lbs or 6 x 1000lbs). Only 2 x 2,000lbs bombs could be carried.

There were 2 ways to carry a heavier load. Either by carrying 2 large bombs externally, or by using the 1,600 lb bomb, 8 of which could be carried in the bomb bay. Neither method was used much, so B-17s tended to be limited to around 6,000lbs maximum bomb load (and frequently less than that).
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 28 May 11, 00:39
strathnaver's Avatar
strathnaver strathnaver is offline
First Lieutenant
Canada
5 Year Service Ribbon 
 
Real Name: Paul Willson
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Victoria BC
Posts: 519
strathnaver is on the path to success [1-99] strathnaver is on the path to success [1-99] strathnaver is on the path to success [1-99] strathnaver is on the path to success [1-99]
Well they were designed for different jobs . The B 17 raid by day the Lancaster by night . The B 17 had .50 cal MG where as the Lancaster had .303 MG's . Also the bomber commands had different operational doctrines the USAAF prefered mass group bombings in formation . The RAF went by night in a bomber stream. They were both aimed at bombing targets in Germany . USAAF tried pin point bombing the RAF area bombing .
__________________

"To all who serve , have or will serve , Thank You"
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 28 May 11, 01:12
wayneok's Avatar
wayneok wayneok is offline
Captain
United_States
Greatest/Best Tank of WW2 Campaign Best Pin-Up Of World War II 
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: bad axe
Posts: 776
wayneok is on the path to success [1-99] wayneok is on the path to success [1-99] wayneok is on the path to success [1-99] wayneok is on the path to success [1-99] wayneok is on the path to success [1-99] wayneok is on the path to success [1-99]
Everything said above is true, both great aircraft. But given the choice I would serve in the B-17
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #11  
Old 28 May 11, 05:59
redcoat's Avatar
redcoat redcoat is offline
General
UK
5 Year Service Ribbon 
 
Real Name: Michael Thomas
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Stockport Cheshire UK
Posts: 4,700
redcoat is simply cracking [600]
redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600]
Quote:
Originally Posted by wayneok View Post
Everything said above is true, both great aircraft. But given the choice I would serve in the B-17
Fair enough, but that would merely indicate which was your favourite aircraft of the two, not which was the best bomber
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 28 May 11, 06:48
Kevinmeath's Avatar
Kevinmeath Kevinmeath is offline
Colonel
Ireland
 
Real Name: Kevin James
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Navan
Posts: 1,807
Kevinmeath is walking in the light [200] Kevinmeath is walking in the light [200] Kevinmeath is walking in the light [200] Kevinmeath is walking in the light [200] Kevinmeath is walking in the light [200] Kevinmeath is walking in the light [200] Kevinmeath is walking in the light [200] Kevinmeath is walking in the light [200] Kevinmeath is walking in the light [200] Kevinmeath is walking in the light [200] Kevinmeath is walking in the light [200] Kevinmeath is walking in the light [200]
Before I decide, was the B-17 intended to bomb in daylight without fighter escort?
__________________
Cymru am Byth
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 28 May 11, 06:51
redcoat's Avatar
redcoat redcoat is offline
General
UK
5 Year Service Ribbon 
 
Real Name: Michael Thomas
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Stockport Cheshire UK
Posts: 4,700
redcoat is simply cracking [600]
redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600] redcoat is simply cracking [600]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevinmeath View Post
Before I decide, was the B-17 intended to bomb in daylight without fighter escort?
Yes.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 28 May 11, 07:37
Kevinmeath's Avatar
Kevinmeath Kevinmeath is offline
Colonel
Ireland
 
Real Name: Kevin James
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Navan
Posts: 1,807
Kevinmeath is walking in the light [200] Kevinmeath is walking in the light [200] Kevinmeath is walking in the light [200] Kevinmeath is walking in the light [200] Kevinmeath is walking in the light [200] Kevinmeath is walking in the light [200] Kevinmeath is walking in the light [200] Kevinmeath is walking in the light [200] Kevinmeath is walking in the light [200] Kevinmeath is walking in the light [200] Kevinmeath is walking in the light [200] Kevinmeath is walking in the light [200]
Quote:
Originally Posted by redcoat View Post
Yes.
So the B-17 failed to do what it was designed to do?

Therefore I'll pick the Lancaster
__________________
Cymru am Byth
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 28 May 11, 08:13
wayneok's Avatar
wayneok wayneok is offline
Captain
United_States
Greatest/Best Tank of WW2 Campaign Best Pin-Up Of World War II 
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: bad axe
Posts: 776
wayneok is on the path to success [1-99] wayneok is on the path to success [1-99] wayneok is on the path to success [1-99] wayneok is on the path to success [1-99] wayneok is on the path to success [1-99] wayneok is on the path to success [1-99]
Quote:
Originally Posted by redcoat View Post
Fair enough, but that would merely indicate which was your favourite aircraft of the two, not which was the best bomber
As stated before, since both were designed for different missions, which is the best is impossible to tell because you can't compare them.
But yes, you are correct the B-17 would be my personal preference based on the fact no mission is described to make any intelligent choice feasible.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Please bookmark this thread if you enjoyed it!


Thread Tools
Display Modes



Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:17.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.