Stryker Vehicle Family - Good or Bad? - Page 16 - Armchair General and HistoryNet >> The Best Forums in History

andrewza · #**226** 17 Mar 13, 15:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by Naffenea

What was the point?

The need is still there.

Naffenea · #**227** 17 Mar 13, 15:56

Quote:

Originally Posted by andrewza

The need is still there.

And we have the equipment to do it when required.

andrewza · #**228** 17 Mar 13, 16:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by Naffenea

And we have the equipment to do it when required.

Awar of that. But some one thought up a need for the bradly (and styker) to be able to swim. But both seem to have lost that abiellty. Though at least there is the USMC.

Half Pint John · #**229** 17 Mar 13, 16:56

Quote:

Originally Posted by Naffenea

And we have the equipment to do it when required.

Give up on the jerk. Your time is better used else where. Like in the toilet shaking the last drop off.

Naffenea · #**230** 17 Mar 13, 22:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by andrewza

Awar of that. But some one thought up a need for the bradly (and styker) to be able to swim. But both seem to have lost that abiellty. Though at least there is the USMC.

Yeah, operational needs dictate how equipment evolves.

andrewza · #**231** 17 Mar 13, 23:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by Half Pint John

Give up on the jerk. Your time is better used else where. Like in the toilet shaking the last drop off.

Why am I a jerk?

andrewza · #**232** 17 Mar 13, 23:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by Naffenea

Yeah, operational needs dictate how equipment evolves.

For the bradly yes. And I never said the bradly was any weaker for it. I would be in a a heavier non swining bardly over a ligher one that can swim (after some prepertions.

The stryker lost that during the concstruction phase. Not through battelfield evolution.