| Notices and Announcements |
You are currently viewing our forums as a GUEST.
- This allows you to read, but not participate in our discussions.
- This also prevents you from downloading attachments and seeing some of our specialized sub-forums.
- Registration is free and painless and requires absolutely no personal information other than a valid email address. :)
You can register for our history forums here. [this reminder disappears once you are registered]
|
| Air Power A place to discuss the implements of War in the Air! |
 |
|

11 Feb 13, 05:25
|
|
| |
Real Name: Jim Olliff
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tuskegee, AL
Posts: 1,809
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Achtung Baby
I'd be double checking that claim... smells more like a tall tales passed on over the years. IIRC, the B-25 isn't very good at low speeds, plus what do you think would happen to the crew inside and the integrity of the airframe should a B-25H abruptly stop midair while going full speed to shoot at a target?.
|
That quote comes from a crew-member of a B-26 and it describes the feel of what happened when the cannon fired, not what actually happened.
The B-25 was alright at low speeds the B-26 was the nasty one.
|

12 Feb 13, 21:39
|
|
| |
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,005
|
|
|
|
The only 2 bad things I recall from conversations with my 5th AF B-25 flying teacher was the slow rate of fire due to the painful reloading process and the damage to the airframe upon repeated firing. Also, there was apparently a lot of residual smoke too, so I suppose that makes 3 negatives. The stopping in mid-air thing, nope, and doesn't make sense either (aerodynamically speaking).
|

12 Feb 13, 23:36
|
|
| |
Real Name: John
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 15,642
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by triggerjockey
Jeez! 8 forward firing .50's plus the 75, that's a whole lotta hurt come'n down.
|
Other B-25 models had as many as 12-.50 caliber machine guns mounted in the nose and "cheek pods" on each side of the cockpit. The bomber's upper turret could also be locked in a forward firing position, making 14 forward firing machineguns. Such aircraft were used in anti-ship, flak-suppression missions. Any Japanese sailors above deck, manning their ship's flak guns would soon be raw meat after being hosed down by such devastatingly effective firepower.
__________________
"Profanity is but a linguistic crutch for illiterate motherbleepers"
|

13 Feb 13, 19:13
|
|
| |
Real Name: John
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 15,642
|
|
|
|
I remember reading of one account by the pilot of a "gunship" where they were making a low level para-frag bombing and strafing run on a Japanese airfield. As they cleared the trees, the pilot saw a Japanese fighterplane on the runway in the process of taking off. The B-25 pilot jiinked his plane slightly, to line up the fighterplane in his sight and squeezed the trigger. The Japanese fighter instantly vaporised in a flashing ball of flame, leaving nothing recognizeable behind.
__________________
"Profanity is but a linguistic crutch for illiterate motherbleepers"
|

24 Feb 13, 20:55
|
|
| |
Real Name: John
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 15,642
|
|
|
Read about the Battle of the Bismarck Sea if you want to see what the heavier armed B-25's, A-20's and Beaufighters were capable of. They sank an entire convoy of Japanese troops meant for their garrison on New Guinea.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Bismarck_Sea
__________________
"Profanity is but a linguistic crutch for illiterate motherbleepers"
|
| Please bookmark this thread if you enjoyed it! |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|