As I understand it, the KGV main guns were mounted in pairs in the quadruple turrets. My question is, did they fire the pair at the same time (because they're going to recoil anyway) or one then the other (to save strain on the recoil mechanism)?
AFAIK they generally fired broadsides, but all guns in one turret fired at slightly different times (milliseconds) to prevent interference in the air and the dispersion resulting from said interference.
I found a video of what I believe is a KGV class (don't know which one) firing it's "A" (forward) quad turret, and I can't discern if it's firing 2 only or 4.
Someone else may be able to clarify.
Guns fire @56sec and again at the end.
I can't discern from the gun flash, only from the amount of gun tube recoil, but it seems there is a (very) slight time difference.
As I understand it, the KGV main guns were mounted in pairs in the quadruple turrets. My question is, did they fire the pair at the same time (because they're going to recoil anyway) or one then the other (to save strain on the recoil mechanism)?
This is wrong. All four are independently mounted in the turret. As far as firing, I'd assume they were fired either individually or in pairs depending on what sort of salvo pattern is required. The pictures below demonstrate this.
__________________
If it wasn't for hypocrisy the Left would have no argument at all...
This is wrong. All four are independently mounted in the turret. As far as firing, I'd assume they were fired either individually or in pairs depending on what sort of salvo pattern is required. The pictures below demonstrate this.
In that first pic, what are those things on top of the turret? There's another one near the bow. Some kind of launchers.
Those are the short lived UP projectors. These launched 3" rockets Mk 4 and 6 that carried a cable intended to act much like barrage balloons. These were replaced by more senciable things like real AA guns.... And, that's the stern not the bow....
__________________
If it wasn't for hypocrisy the Left would have no argument at all...
This is wrong. All four are independently mounted in the turret. As far as firing, I'd assume they were fired either individually or in pairs depending on what sort of salvo pattern is required. The pictures below demonstrate this.
Hi
The guns were fired either in pairs or singularly. However in the pair firings, the two guns being fired were never the ones next to each other. Thus if the four were noted as A B C D, you would fire A&D together, A&C, or B&D. and never A&B, B&C or C&D, for the reasons noted earlier. However I imagine that in a needs must scenario, that such 'polite' rules may well have been infringed
Those are the short lived UP projectors. These launched 3" rockets Mk 4 and 6 that carried a cable intended to act much like barrage balloons. These were replaced by more senciable things like real AA guns.... And, that's the stern not the bow....
The UP's were a stop gap device for the shortage of decent AA guns.
One of the many theories about what caused HMS Hood to blow up and sink has surrounded a shell igniting the UP ammunition store.
As I understand it, the KGV main guns were mounted in pairs in the quadruple turrets. My question is, did they fire the pair at the same time (because they're going to recoil anyway) or one then the other (to save strain on the recoil mechanism)?
... of the French Dunkerques and Richelieus. Unlike the beamier KGVs, the French 4 gun main turrets were split into 2 halves internally to save on weight in mounts and loading arrangements. French gun breechblocks were unique in that they opened upwards to facilitate loading in tight quarters. They did in fact also fire by pairs simultaneously, which did indeed cause some shell dispersion.
You can see how they're paired up in these photos of Dunkerque, looking forward, and aft:
__________________
"Where is the hunter when the reindeer has its hoof in a pool of lava?" - Russian Proverb, Bartalamyeh Fyodorevitch