HistoryNet.com RSS
ArmchairGeneral.com RSS

HistoryNet.com Articles
America's Civil War
American History
Aviation History
British Heritage
Civil War Times
MHQ
Military History
Vietnam
Wild West
World War II

ACG Online
ACG Magazine
Stuff We Like
War College
History News
Tactics 101
Carlo D'Este
Books

ACG Gaming
Boardgames
PC Game Reviews

ACG Network
Contact Us
Our Newsletter
Meet Our Staff
Advertise With Us

Sites We Support
HistoryNet.com
Once A Marine
The Art of Battle
Game Squad
Mil. History Podcast
Russian Army - WW2
Achtung Panzer!
Mil History Online

Go Back   Armchair General and HistoryNet >> The Best Forums in History > Best Games in History > Turn-Based Strategy Games

Notices and Announcements

Turn-Based Strategy Games For all games that follow a turn-based format.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04 Feb 13, 11:44
samspade73's Avatar
samspade73 samspade73 is offline
Recruit
United_States
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Portland
Posts: 3
samspade73 is on the path to success [1-99]
Looking for Time of Fury PBEM Opponent

Greetings,

I'm looking for a PBEM opponent for Time of Fury, using Slitherine's PBEM system. I'd be up for playing just one foe as either the Axis or Allies or, even better, getting a group of several players together (as long as I'm playing either major Axis or Ally power, Russia or some grouping of smaller countries that won't be out after the forth turn). I would reliably play 1-2 turns a day and I'd describe my experience as Veteran. Drop me a line if you're interested.

Cheers,
Reply With Quote
Facebook Connect and Magazine Promotions

World War II Magazine
$26.95

Armchair General Magazine
$26.95
Military History Magazine
$26.95
  #2  
Old 13 Feb 13, 09:19
Charger's Avatar
Charger Charger is offline
First Lieutenant
United_States
5 Year Service Ribbon 
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 613
Charger is on the path to success [1-99] Charger is on the path to success [1-99] Charger is on the path to success [1-99] Charger is on the path to success [1-99]
Can you tell me about the game? Is it worth getting?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 13 Feb 13, 12:09
samspade73's Avatar
samspade73 samspade73 is offline
Recruit
United_States
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Portland
Posts: 3
samspade73 is on the path to success [1-99]
Impressions of Time of Fury

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charger View Post
Can you tell me about the game? Is it worth getting?
In reading many reviews and opinions on all the strategy games out there before I make a purchase I have to say what makes an enjoyable strategy game is pretty subjective. But, the reviews I find valuable tell me about the features, limitations and overall playing experience in addition to what other games they've liked so I can get a sense of their taste so I can decide if it's to my liking so I'll do my best to do the same.

First of all. Anyone looking at buying Time of Fury (2011) should know it's a slightly updated, less glitchy, overall smoother version of WW2 Time of Wrath put out in 2009. I bought Time of Wrath, played the hell out of it for 9 months, bought ToF and was a little surprised it was basically a new version of the game with some minor improvements. The fact that matrix will give you a 30% discount if you own Time of Wrath and are purchasing Time of Fury shows even they believe it to be mostly an improved version of the same game although they haven't come out and said it. If you haven't purchased either game, skip Time of Wrath and go straight to Time of Fury as long as spending the extra $20 isn't an issue.

I am a detailed oriented person and do love long drawn out strategy games with some logistics, diplomacy, tech trees and variables like historical factors, weather, random luck, etc. But for my tastes there can be too much of that in a game too. I was bored to death of games with so much logistics and managing mundane tasks, like Arsenal of Democracy and Iron Cross and I wasn't a fan of steep learning curve. I enjoyed playing Victoria 2, but I could have done without a few aspects of logistics management, which thankfully some of the expansions did away with. I also don't like games that are so focused on combat and overly simplistic like 1st person shooter games where you can get shot three times and keep on truckin' (the closest game to a 1st person shooter I love is World of Tanks.) I think Time of Fury generally pleases the minutia freaks that love Arsenal of Democracy although might leaving them wanting a little more but also generally pleases those who are more of the Company of Heroes types that might feel Time of Fury campaigns take a little long (grand campaigns are about 400-450 rounds). Overall the game feels and plays fairly historically accurate but still gives you choices to take your country or Axis/Allies in a different direction. An example is that in one grand campaign I systematically didn't develop Germany's navy so I could send all that steel into Russia, which meant an invasion of England was never going to happen.

The learning curve for Time of Fury is short. Within 30 mins of starting up the game I knew how to fully play the game with the exception of one or two little tasks which I figured out in my warm up scenario, but it wasn't so basic I was sick of it fast. I've played against the AI through several shorter campaigns, one grand campaign and two medium length campaigns over several months. I am a little bored playing against the AI so I've moved on playing others through the game's PBEM+ (play by email) system which doesn't really use email other than to make occasional contact with another player. The PBEM system for Time of Wrath was a nightmare of zipping, emailing and unzipping files to other players (with occasional crashes and glitches) that made me give up. I haven't had any problems playing others online with Time of Fury. I paid $27 for the game and I feel as though I have gotten my money's worth and for me, I only feel like I get a good value for my game dollar out of about 1/3 the games I buy. I'm a little on the frugal side so $40 feels a little steep to me but I'd say I've played it enough to justify even the full price. A few times a year (I know around Christmas) Matrix has sales, especially on their older games that knock off about 20-30%. If you wind up buying this game and like it, you'll like Storm over the Pacific. It's the same game as Time of Fury but obviously set in the Pacific. It has the stream lined PBEM+ system for playing other players online and has an advanced interface to control units, development and logistics, but not so much I'm overwhelmed and it reminds me too much of my day job. I'd also suggest looking at Panzer Corps, made my Matrix too.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 14 Feb 13, 09:34
Charger's Avatar
Charger Charger is offline
First Lieutenant
United_States
5 Year Service Ribbon 
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 613
Charger is on the path to success [1-99] Charger is on the path to success [1-99] Charger is on the path to success [1-99] Charger is on the path to success [1-99]
Hm interesting. Looks like a good game but with so many strategic WWII wargames it's hard to know what tells them apart. Thanks for the write-up, it was very descriptive. I'll watch and see if it ever goes on sale!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 22 Feb 13, 07:20
fishski7's Avatar
fishski7 fishski7 is offline
Recruit
United_States
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Tigard, OR
Posts: 1
fishski7 is a balanced individual [0]
Quote:
Originally Posted by samspade73 View Post
Greetings,

I'm looking for a PBEM opponent for Time of Fury, using Slitherine's PBEM system. I'd be up for playing just one foe as either the Axis or Allies or, even better, getting a group of several players together (as long as I'm playing either major Axis or Ally power, Russia or some grouping of smaller countries that won't be out after the forth turn). I would reliably play 1-2 turns a day and I'd describe my experience as Veteran. Drop me a line if you're interested.

Cheers,
I don't own TOF yet and am looking for advice from people who do on how they like it in relation to some of the other RTS options? Also from Portland (Tigard)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 22 Feb 13, 13:37
StellarRat's Avatar
StellarRat StellarRat is offline
Gunnery Sergeant
United_States
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Salem
Posts: 208
StellarRat is on the path to success [1-99] StellarRat is on the path to success [1-99]
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishski7 View Post
I don't own TOF yet and am looking for advice from people who do on how they like it in relation to some of the other RTS options? Also from Portland (Tigard)
It's not an RTS game. It's turn based. That is much appropriate for the scale of the game IMO. I found TOF to be complex enough to use real military strategy, but not so complex to be cumbersome. Get the essential elements of military operations without a bunch of minutiae. Example: Supply lines matter, but you don't have to direct trucks, draw supply lines, etc... It reminds me very much of some of those excellent Avalon Hill board games I used to play, but it's totally computerized.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Please bookmark this thread if you enjoyed it!


Thread Tools
Display Modes



Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:30.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.