Go Back   Armchair General and HistoryNet >> The Best Forums in History > Historical Events & Eras > Weapons of War

Notices and Announcements

Weapons of War The machinery of warfare. .

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05 May 12, 18:15
KRJ's Avatar
KRJ KRJ is offline
First Lieutenant
United_States
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wyoming Territory
Posts: 634
KRJ is on the path to success [1-99] KRJ is on the path to success [1-99] KRJ is on the path to success [1-99] KRJ is on the path to success [1-99] KRJ is on the path to success [1-99] KRJ is on the path to success [1-99] KRJ is on the path to success [1-99]
Weapons platoon and squad

I do not believe Army rifle platoons should have a TOE weapons squad as they currently do (or did in my day). I believe rifle platoon leaders would be better served if companies have a robust weapons platoon in order to task organize weapons squads of various configurations for attachment to rifle platoons according to METT-TC.

Sometimes the platoon needs more rockets than guns, sometimes more guns than rockets, sometimes a mortar and sometimes not, sometimes a mix of crew served weapons.

Squad leaders in the weapons platoon should be senior staff sergeants trained to advise a rifle platoon leader on the employment of any crew served weapon in the company. So although a particular staff sergeant may be the machine gun squad leader in garrison, for operations he should be able to take one of his gun teams, a rocket team, and a mortar team (or any mix required) and report to a rifle platoon leader as a weapons squad.

It would help matters if the weapons platoon leader was a warrant officer from the infantry NCO ranks; something similar to the USMC gunners but one per rifle company. The Army did something similar in Special Forces with the assistant ODA leaders; they're assistant team leaders for their career. The weapons platoon leader would be similar. This WO could also serve as a capable temporary rifle platoon leader for the duration of an operation should the LT become a casualty. A WO weapons specialist would give the rifle company additional capability and stability.

Thoughts?
__________________
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Reply With Quote
Facebook Connect and Magazine Promotions

World War II Magazine
$26.95

Armchair General Magazine
$26.95
Military History Magazine
$26.95
  #2  
Old 05 May 12, 18:30
The Land's Avatar
The Land The Land is offline
Lieutenant Colonel
UK
CWiE 1939-45 Campaign 
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,270
The Land has demonstrated strength of character [100] The Land has demonstrated strength of character [100] The Land has demonstrated strength of character [100] The Land has demonstrated strength of character [100] The Land has demonstrated strength of character [100] The Land has demonstrated strength of character [100] The Land has demonstrated strength of character [100] The Land has demonstrated strength of character [100] The Land has demonstrated strength of character [100] The Land has demonstrated strength of character [100]
Quote:
Originally Posted by KRJ View Post
Thoughts?
Does this not happen in practice in any case, that different support weapons are shared out amongst the company according to the tactical situation, rather than sticking rigidly to the platoon structure?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05 May 12, 21:19
KRJ's Avatar
KRJ KRJ is offline
First Lieutenant
United_States
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wyoming Territory
Posts: 634
KRJ is on the path to success [1-99] KRJ is on the path to success [1-99] KRJ is on the path to success [1-99] KRJ is on the path to success [1-99] KRJ is on the path to success [1-99] KRJ is on the path to success [1-99] KRJ is on the path to success [1-99]
Yes, to an extent. But rifle platoons still have a weapons squad. I think it would be better for training and proficiency to have everything crew-served located in a weapons platoon under senior staff sergents and a WO weapons specialist platoon leader. Form weapons squads for attachment to rifle platoons as needed.
__________________
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05 May 12, 21:21
TacCovert4's Avatar
TacCovert4 TacCovert4 is offline
General of the Forums
United_States
March Offensive 5 Year Service Ribbon CWiE 1939-45 Campaign Greatest/Best Tank of WW2 Campaign 
 
Real Name: Taceus Covertros
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: In Corinth
Posts: 9,615
TacCovert4 has earned the respect of all [900] TacCovert4 has earned the respect of all [900]
TacCovert4 has earned the respect of all [900] TacCovert4 has earned the respect of all [900] TacCovert4 has earned the respect of all [900] TacCovert4 has earned the respect of all [900] TacCovert4 has earned the respect of all [900] TacCovert4 has earned the respect of all [900] TacCovert4 has earned the respect of all [900] TacCovert4 has earned the respect of all [900] TacCovert4 has earned the respect of all [900]
In what organization do they have a weapons squad? I don't remember any rifle platoons with weapons squads, those were all company assets....which was why I was advocating a weapons squad be integrated to bring assets to a lower level instead of concentrating them at the Company.
__________________
GM of Koingerdammerung, the Beginnings

Lieutenant Tac, Weapons Platoon
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05 May 12, 22:53
KRJ's Avatar
KRJ KRJ is offline
First Lieutenant
United_States
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wyoming Territory
Posts: 634
KRJ is on the path to success [1-99] KRJ is on the path to success [1-99] KRJ is on the path to success [1-99] KRJ is on the path to success [1-99] KRJ is on the path to success [1-99] KRJ is on the path to success [1-99] KRJ is on the path to success [1-99]
Quote:
Originally Posted by TacCovert4 View Post
In what organization do they have a weapons squad?
The Army rifle platoon has a weapons squad. It used to be two machine gun teams and two Javelin teams. Not sure about it's current composiiton. The company did not have a true weapons platoon, just a mortar section.

I agree with you that the platoon should be the focus. But after some thought I think a task organized weapons squad would be better than a TOE weapons squad. For task organization you need a weapons platoon to draw from.
__________________
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05 May 12, 23:20
lcm1's Avatar
lcm1 lcm1 is offline
General of the Forums
Australia
Distinguished Service Award 5 Year Service Ribbon Best Pin-Up Of World War II 
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Perth
Posts: 9,835
lcm1 is simply cracking [600]
lcm1 is simply cracking [600] lcm1 is simply cracking [600] lcm1 is simply cracking [600] lcm1 is simply cracking [600] lcm1 is simply cracking [600] lcm1 is simply cracking [600] lcm1 is simply cracking [600] lcm1 is simply cracking [600] lcm1 is simply cracking [600] lcm1 is simply cracking [600] lcm1 is simply cracking [600] lcm1 is simply cracking [600]
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Land View Post
Does this not happen in practice in any case, that different support weapons are shared out amongst the company according to the tactical situation, rather than sticking rigidly to the platoon structure?
Well it did in the mob that I was in! lcm1
__________________
'By Horse by Tram'.


I was in when they needed 'em,not feeded 'em.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Please bookmark this thread if you enjoyed it!


Thread Tools
Display Modes



Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:28.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.