View Single Post
  #119  
Old 24 Feb 12, 00:09
clackers's Avatar
clackers clackers is online now
Lieutenant General
Australia
5 Year Service Ribbon 
 
Real Name: Ian
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,019
clackers is on a distinguished road [300] clackers is on a distinguished road [300] clackers is on a distinguished road [300] clackers is on a distinguished road [300] clackers is on a distinguished road [300] clackers is on a distinguished road [300] clackers is on a distinguished road [300] clackers is on a distinguished road [300] clackers is on a distinguished road [300] clackers is on a distinguished road [300] clackers is on a distinguished road [300] clackers is on a distinguished road [300] clackers is on a distinguished road [300] clackers is on a distinguished road [300] clackers is on a distinguished road [300]
Quote:
Originally Posted by ljadw View Post
IMHO,it is wrong to say that the battle of Kalkhin Gol decided the Japanese to avoid in the future any fighting with the Soviets :that's the old-fahioned,obsolete way of thinking(I thought it was ericated) that's giving individual battles an importance they never had :if Japan was going south and not north,it was 1) because there was nothing usefull in Siberia 2) because ,from the Japanese POV,there were obliged to go south,because of the US embargo .
On (1): The Soviet Union was regarded by the IJA from the 1920s up to 1939 as the most likely nation to take on in a war.

On (2): To go south would mean the IJN would get all the resources and the glory, which the IJA wouldn't tolerate until the humiliation of Khalkhin Gol meant it lost all credibility anyway. The eccentric Foreign Minister Yosuke Matsuoka was the one guy who in 1941 wanted to revive the Go North strategy, and was sacked for it.

For the devastating outcome of the battle for the Japanese generals involved, check Alvin Coox's Nomonhan: Japan Against Russia, 1939