CDG Solution Winners #27: Farragut at Mobile Bay

Armchair General staff | September 10, 2008  | one comment  | Print  | E-mail

Here are excerpts from the winning Reader Solutions to “Farragut at Mobile Bay, 1864" and a list of honorable mentions.

Dale Malchow, Washington – “Battle plan must contain good intel and stress speed through the channel. It should be aggressive, simplistic and exercise command, control and communication. Farragut’s flagship in van of wooden ships to acquire situational awareness.”

John Rusko, Ohio – “To heck with those underwater mines, let us move forward with all possible velocity. Our concentrated firepower on the Tennessee should sink her before she can do us any real damage. Acting as one cohesive unit instead of a piecemeal attack will serve our purpose better.”

Maurits Wiuff, Denmark – “Farragut’s main advantage lies in his superior fleet strength — mobility and firepower. An attack must be aggressive and fast to keep the initiative.”

Congratulations to our Armchair Generals!
Dale Malchow, Washington
John Rusko, Ohio
Maurits Wiuff, Denmark

They beat out some tough competition!
HONORABLE MENTION
William B. Allred, Texas
Gavin Bowman, Canada
Nick A. Chapman, Mich
William J. Cherry, NY.
James Cucchi, Mass.
Melvin N. Eichelbaum, Texas
Karen Hauer, In.
Taylor Holbrook, Ken.
Joe Irwin, Calif.
Kenneth R. Mayer, Penn.
ISCM Mark Pearson, Va,
SSG Robert Martin, Va.
Paul Penrod, Md.
Matteo Santus, Lodi, Italy
William J. Silberberger, Calif.
John D. Smith, Texas
Robert B. Smith, Az
Luke Thomas Teall, Mich.
Joseph Thompson, Ga.
Jeffrey A. Tucker, Ohio
LTC (USA, Ret.) Frank X. Weiss, NY
Daniel Weitz, SC
Tom Willison, In.
Gary Young, Calif.
Tyler Young, Calif.

Help Armchair General by bookmarking to