Pages Menu

Categories Menu

Posted on Mar 7, 2014 in Armchair Reading

CDG 62 – Anglo-Egyptian War, 1882

CDG 62 – Anglo-Egyptian War, 1882

By Andrew H. Hershey

The article below is an abridged version of Combat Decision Game #62, “Anglo-Egyptian War, 1882,” written by Andrew H. Hershey. Additional text and illustrations appear in the May 2014 edition of Armchair General® magazine, where you’ll also find additional interactive articles based on a U.S. Paratroopers in Normandy, 1944, and Yamashita’s invasion of Malaya, 1941-42. In stores now.

This CDG places readers in the role of Lieutenant General Garnet Wolseley, leading British troops in an attack to decide the fate of Egypt.

Armchair General® challenges YOU to take command of this historical battle. Here’s how to get in on the action:

READ the article carefully
DEVELOP your own solution to this tactical dilemma
RECORD your solution on the CDG map and form from the attached PDF.
MAIL your completed Reader Solution to Armchair General, CDG #62, 2060 E. Avenida de los Arboles #373, Thousand Oaks, CA 91362. Or email your solution to cdg(at) or fax it to (805) 293-8790.; entry must be received by April 25, 2014

Subscribe Today

Winning solutions will be announced in the September 2014 issue. However, those eager to read the historical outcome and analysis can log on to after April 28, 2014.

* * *

In the last quarter of the 19th century, empires controlled much of the world. The competition among imperial powers to expand their territory through occupation or financial-economic domination was fierce. Yet not all imperial powers were equal; some were on the rise while others were in decline.

The Ottoman Empire in 1882 was the most prominent example of the latter, earning the unenviable nickname “The Sick Man of Europe.” At its greatest extent in the 16th and 17th centuries, the Ottoman Empire included vast territories in Anatolia (modern Turkey), the Middle East, North Africa, southern Europe and the Caucasus. Thereafter, Ottoman rulers in the capital at Constantinople presided over a steady loss of territory and, increasingly, economic domination by other imperial powers.

Moreover, many remaining portions of the shrinking empire, such as Egypt, were Ottoman in name only. Egypt’s khedive (viceroy) was only nominally under Ottoman rule, and the country’s economy was dominated by foreign business interests, principally British and French. Indeed, London and Paris exerted more influence on Egypt than did Constantinople. For instance, the Suez Canal, a vital link in global sea commerce, was jointly owned by French (55 percent) and British (45 percent) stockholders. Ottoman weakness in Egypt exposed the country to increased control and exploitation by the European powers, particularly Britain.

Britain in 1882 was an imperial power on the rise. The saying “the sun never sets on the British Empire” was literally true. Britain’s globe-circling possessions encompassed 10 million square miles, and 400 million people were subjects of British Queen Victoria. Britain sought to enlarge its burgeoning empire and vigorously reacted against any threat to its global power and influence. Therefore when a disaffected, anti-Western Egyptian army officer, Arabi Pasha, led a coup that seized power from Egypt’s Britain-friendly khedive, Tewfik Pasha, British leaders decided to take military action to eliminate this threat to their country’s extensive financial and expansionist interests in Egypt and, especially, to maintain control of the Suez Canal.

Britain’s senior service, the Royal Navy, was sent first to deal with the Egyptian crisis. Admiral Frederick Beauchamp Seymour led a fleet of warships to Alexandria Harbor, where he issued an ultimatum to Arabi to stop fortifying Alexandria’s defenses. When the ultimatum expired on July 11, 1882, the British fleet bombarded Alexandria for 10 hours and then sent a contingent of Royal Marines to occupy portions of the city.

This, however, only further inflamed the Egyptian population’s anti-Western sentiments and strengthened Arabi’s hold on power. British leaders realized they could only overthrow Arabi by sending a substantial, well-armed military expedition to Egypt to defeat his army and occupy the country’s capital, Cairo. It was time to send in the British army.

Armchair General® takes you back to September 13, 1882, in the Egyptian desert northeast of Cairo, not far from the Suez Canal, where you will play the role of Lieutenant General Garnet Wolseley, commander of a British army expeditionary force. Your mission is to attack and defeat Arabi Pasha’s 20,000-man Egyptian army, which consists of infantry, cavalry and artillery. Once your force has routed Arabi’s men, you will lead it southwest to occupy Cairo and thereby firmly establish British control of Egypt.

Although your troops are better trained and more disciplined than Arabi’s Egyptian soldiers, his men occupy entrenched positions with good fields of fire. Moreover, they are motivated by the idea of defending their country against “infidel” invaders. If you fail to achieve victory in this battle, British prestige will suffer a serious blow that will reverberate throughout Britain’s global empire. Therefore, much more than British control of Egypt is at stake.


After the Royal Navy’s July 1882 bombardment and occupation of Alexandria failed to force Arabi’s overthrow, you, due to your outstanding record of military service, were the obvious choice to command the British army expeditionary force and lead it to Egypt in early August.

Thirty years ago, in 1852, you entered the British army as a 19-year-old ensign. You saw your first action – and suffered your first battle wound – in Burma in 1853. In 1855, you were wounded twice in the Crimean War, where you were singled out by senior commanders for your exceptional leadership under fire. Successful combat command during the 1857 Indian Mutiny and the 1873-74 Ashanti War in West Africa solidified your reputation as Britain’s foremost military commander. Now, the outcome of what has escalated into an Anglo-Egyptian war rests in your hands.

Instead of marshaling your expeditionary force at Alexandria to march on Cairo from the northwest, you landed it at Ismailia on the Suez Canal. This not only protects the canal but also has compelled Arabi to reposition his army in an attempt to block your advance on the capital. This is exactly what you intended, as it will allow you to bring Arabi’s men to battle and decisively defeat them.

After emplacing part of your expeditionary force in defensive positions protecting the canal, you led a group of combat troops west into the desert to strike Arabi’s army. Your attacking force consists of four infantry brigades with a total of 11,000 men, two cavalry brigades with a combined 2,000 troopers, and an artillery brigade of 54 guns.

Two of your infantry brigades, one commanded by Major General Gerald Graham and the other by Archibald Alison, are “heavy,” consisting of four battalions of foot soldiers. A third brigade, commanded by Prince Arthur, Duke of Connaught, has three Guards battalions, while Colonel Cromer Ashburnham’s fourth brigade is a “light” unit with only two infantry battalions. All 11,000 infantrymen are armed with breech-loading, single-shot .45-caliber Martini-Henry rifles. These well-trained, highly disciplined soldiers can deliver effective volley fire at 600 yards and accurate aimed fire at 350-400 yards.

Your cavalry contingent’s two brigades each contain three regiments with 350 troopers per regiment. Brigadier General Baker Creed Russell commands one brigade, while Brigadier General H.C. Wilkinson commands the other. The cavalrymen are armed with sabers and .476-caliber Mk I Enfield revolvers, except for one Bengal Lancer regiment armed with 9-foot lances. All of your cavalry units are well led and superbly trained, capable of executing precise battlefield maneuvers, delivering powerful mounted charges and conducting rapid pursuits of fleeing enemy troops.

Your artillery brigade, commanded by Brigadier General W.H. Goodenough, consists of seven batteries of Royal Artillery supporting the infantry brigades and two batteries of highly mobile Royal Horse Artillery supporting the cavalry brigades. The expedition’s 54 artillery guns are rifled muzzle-loading weapons of various calibers: 76 mm, 90 mm, 121 mm and 160 mm. Your well-trained gun crews, particularly the elite Royal Horse Artillerymen, expertly handle these weapons to deliver fast, accurate artillery fire.


Arabi’s coup placed him in command of Egypt’s regular army, where he was welcomed by sympathetic commanders who embraced his anti-Western policies. The Egyptian troops are well trained, although not up to the more rigorous standards of combat-experienced British army soldiers. Principally an infantry force, Arabi’s 20,000-strong army is built around 20 infantry battalions whose soldiers carry breech-loading .43-caliber Remington rolling block rifles. Although these U.S.-manufactured weapons have a greater volley range than do your men’s rifles, their effective aimed fire is only 200-300 yards.

The Egyptian army’s cavalry arm consists of 2,000 horse soldiers, each armed with the carbine version of the Remington rifle. Composed mainly of wild Bedouin tribesmen, Arabi’s cavalry fights fiercely in melee combat. However, unlike your British soldiers, his men lack the strict military discipline necessary to execute precise battlefield maneuvers or mount overwhelming charges by closely packed ranks of horsemen.

The Egyptian army’s 62 artillery guns are mainly 80 mm and 90 mm rifled breech-loading Krupp C-64 field cannon – the same type the Prussian army used so effectively in the 1870-71 Franco-Prussian War – and a few French-manufactured field pieces. Although the modern Krupp cannon are superior to British artillery guns, Egyptian crewmen in general are not as well drilled or as skilled as Royal Artillerymen.


Click to download larger version.

Click to download larger version.

By yesterday, September 12, your force had marched westward from the Suez Canal to a position in the desert about seven miles from Arabi’s army. After spending all day conducting a personal reconnaissance, you learned that Arabi has placed his force in a strong defensive position firmly anchored on the east-west running Sweet Water Canal. (See map at right.) The main Egyptian defensive line, which extends approximately four miles north perpendicular to the canal, consists of a 12-foot-wide main trench, successive lines of supporting trenches, thick earthen embankments, covered walkways, artillery-gun positions, several redoubts, and protected firing embrasures for artillery and infantry riflemen.

After nightfall, you decided to move your army under cover of darkness to an attack position about 1,000 yards east of the Egyptian trench line. You realized the intervening high ground would obscure your troops from the enemy’s view and allow you to form them for an attack without revealing your dispositions to the Egyptians until you are ready to strike.

Your intention is to launch your attack at dawn. Therefore now, a few hours after midnight, you gather your subordinate commanders at your desert command post to brief them on three possible courses of action you are considering. You are interested in hearing their insights on each plan.

“The first course of action I am considering,” you begin, “is to unhinge the Egyptian line at its southernmost point, where it is anchored on Sweet Water Canal, by launching Alison’s and Graham’s two heavy infantry brigades in a left flank attack. To fix the enemy in place while the main force strikes, our remaining two infantry brigades and the artillery brigade will engage the Egyptian line frontally with concentrated rifle and artillery fire. The cavalry brigades will guard our right flank against any threat in the north from the enemy cavalry.”

Alison immediately endorses this plan. “General,” he responds, “by destroying the anchor of the enemy trench line – cutting it adrift, so to speak – we will effectively neutralize the strength of Arabi’s position, making it untenable. The Egyptians will have only two choices: a hasty retreat or surrender.”

The Duke of Connaught, however, is not as enthusiastic. “Garnet,” he interjects, “as Alison’s and Graham’s brigades advance over the open terrain, their men will be fully exposed to concentrated fire from the Egyptian artillery. Moreover, as our leading infantrymen break through the enemy line, they will be extremely vulnerable to counterattack until Alison and Graham can push sufficient troops through the breach to consolidate the breakthrough. I fear this plan puts us at risk of failure.”

“My second option,” you continue, “is to launch Alison’s and Graham’s infantry brigades and the cavalry brigades in a powerful attack in the north to collapse the Egyptian line on our right flank. As in the first plan, our remaining infantry brigades and the artillery brigade will fix the enemy in place with concentrated rifle and artillery fire all along the rest of the line.”

This time, Graham objects. “General,” he complains, “unlike the first plan, which destroys the anchor of the enemy line in a stroke and makes the entire position untenable, this course of action initially seizes only the far northern portion of the 4-mile-long trench line, leaving the remainder of it intact. This forces our infantry to engage in costly, time-consuming close-quarter combat to clear the entire trench line, position by position, all the way south to Sweet Water Canal.”

Goodenough, however, disagrees. “My artillery will heavily bombard the length of the enemy line,” he explains, “destroying its strongpoints and battering the defenders unmercifully. With shells raining down on them, and with our infantry moving inexorably south through the trenches, I expect the Egyptians to break and run, making it unnecessary for our infantrymen to clear the whole line. Once the Egyptians are on open ground, our cavalrymen will make short work of them.”

“The final plan,” you conclude, “is to overpower the entire Egyptian line with a strong frontal attack conducted by all four infantry brigades supported by a heavy artillery bombardment. As the attack commences, our cavalry brigades will launch a charge from our extreme right flank into the enemy rear area to prevent Arabi from shifting troops to threatened sections and to disrupt any attempt to bring up reinforcements. After our infantrymen overrun the trench line, our cavalrymen will pursue the fleeing Egyptians and, upon my order, strike quickly toward Cairo.”

After exchanging worried glances with Graham, Alison says, “With respect, General, won’t we be playing to the Egyptians’ strength by launching a head-on attack over open ground against well-entrenched infantry and artillery? It seems this plan unnecessarily puts us at risk of incurring heavy casualties and could result in failure. I have the greatest confidence in our soldiers’ bravery and discipline under fire, but I fear that directly assaulting the entire Egyptian line in this manner is asking too much of them.”

Since dawn is about to break, you must conclude the meeting and decide how you will attack and defeat Arabi’s army. “Thank you, gentlemen,” you announce, signaling that the meeting is over. “Please return to your units and prepare them for the impending action. I will inform you of my plan forthwith.”

Once your subordinate commanders depart, you reflect on their comments as you weigh the advantages and disadvantages of each course of action. However, now is the time for you to choose the one you believe will be most effective.

What is your decision, Lieutenant General Wolseley?

Click here to download a pdf of the map and submission form for Combat Decision Game No. 62.

About the Author
Andrew H. Hershey
holds a doctorate in medieval history from the University of London. He contributes to the “USMC Gazette” and is a four-time winner of its Tactical Decision Game design contests. He also designs World War II tactical-level wargames for Heat of Battle and Le Franc Tireur.

Find earlier Combat Decision Games by clicking here.



  1. CDG Command Center | Armchair General | Armchair General Magazine - We Put YOU in Command! - […] 2014 Anglo-Egyptian War, 1882 PDF Pullout Historical Outcome – To be published after April 28, […]
  2. Armchair General May 2014 Issue – South Vietnam’s Trial by Fire | Armchair General | Armchair General Magazine - We Put YOU in Command! - […] Combat Decision # 62: Anglo-Egyptian War, 1882 […]

Post a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>