Armchair General small spacer
Armchair General magazine mastheadGo to Weider History GroupSubscribe to Armchair General MagazineLearn about latest issue of Armchair General

CDG 29 Aussies at Buna, 1942 – Outcome and Analysis

Armchair General staff | November 18, 2008  | 2 comments  | Print  | E-mail

Subscribe Today

The Australians’ “bunker busting” finally broke through the main Japanese defenses around 2 p.m., although some enemy positions still held out. After four days of continuous combat, Cummings’ men pushed the remaining Japanese into a final defensive perimeter around the new airfield. On December 22 Cummings’ battalion, having suffered 374 casualties (56 percent of the battalion was killed, wounded or missing), was pulled out of line for a well-earned rest. The Australian 2d Battalion, 10th Infantry Brigade took over and eliminated the last Japanese holdouts.

Australian assualt on Buna. Map by Petho Cartography.
Australian assualt on Buna. Map by Petho Cartography.
By January 3, 1943, Buna was in Allied hands. Gona fell on December 6 and Sanananda on January 22; thus MacArthur’s troops had completed their takeover of the Gona-Sanananda-Buna strongholds. Allied casualties for the campaign were 2,300 killed and 1,200 wounded. Virtually all of the 6,000 Japanese defenders had fought to the death. Within weeks of Buna’s capture, MacArthur began his brilliant island-hopping campaign along New Guinea’s northern coast that led to his triumphant return to the Philippines.

Map Caption: On December 18, 1942, Lt. Col. Clem Cummings launched a battalion frontal attack against the Japanese defenders at Buna, New Guinea, arraying his four infantry companies “on line” and supporting them with tanks, Bren Gun Carriers, and artillery and mortar fire. Although his Australian troops suffered a 56 percent casualty rate, by December 22 they had pushed the Japanese remnants into a tiny enclave at the new airfield. Buna was declared secure on January 3, 1943.

Want to try your hand at ACG’s next Combat Command Decision Game, Fighting Napoleon’s Armies in Spain, 1808? Click on the link to download the map.

Pages: 1 2

Tags: ,

  1. 2 Comments to “CDG 29 Aussies at Buna, 1942 – Outcome and Analysis”

  2. After the Papuan campaign, both sides were pretty stuffed for months. Virtually all the allied infantry units were a fraction of their nominal strength. Macarthur’s leadership was extremely poor during this campaign, urging both Americans directly and Australians by proxy to attack at all costs, without doing proper reconnaissance. The allied leadership do appear to have learned the appropriate lessons, leading to the extremely successful Huon peninsula campaign, which, by essentially outflanking Rabaul where Japanese capital ships dare not go, led to the island hopping campaign. This didn’t really get going until 15 months after Buna, with the Atiape landings in April 1944.

    The casualties suffered by the 2/9 battalion were excessive and unforgivable. In the lead-up, Macarthur had strongly criticized Australian performances at Kokoda trail and Milne bay. When the Americans became bogged down at Buna, the Australians sent this battalion in an over-hasty attack to demonstrate to the Americans that they were a capable army, suffering excessive casualties as a result.

    By peter_ga on Jul 12, 2009 at 5:50 am

  1. 1 Trackback(s)

  2. Nov 21, 2008: CDG Command Center » Armchair General

Post a Comment

Please note that Armchair General Staff cannot respond to requests for research of any type. Please visit our research forum to post research questions. If you have a question about our magazine, please use the contact us form.

Related Articles




Armchair General Spacer

SPONSORED SITES




Armchair General Spacer

OPINION POLL

Q: Which of these two conquerors do you rate as the greatest?

View Results

See previous polls

STAY CONNECTED WITH US

RSS Feed
 
Daily Armchair General Update
 
 

Armchair General on Twitter Armchair General on Myspace Armchair General on Facebook

What is Armchair General?

Armchair General (ACG) and ACG online feature a unique, interactive editorial approach that invites the reader to decide the course of action in challenging historical scenarios, to step into the shoes of a battlefield commander. Leading historians and contributors lend integrity and credibility to this fresh presentation of historical and contemporary events.

Armchair General is the INTERACTIVE history magazine where YOU COMMAND and decide the course of action!

Armchair General's Feedburner Link Get our RSS!
Weider History Group Newsletter Newsletter Signup

What We Write About

Our Other Magazines

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer!

Copyright © 2004-2008 Armchair General L.L.C., All rights reserved.