<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Epic of the Peloponnesian War &#8211; Boardgame Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.armchairgeneral.com/boardgames-epic-of-the-peloponnesian-war.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.armchairgeneral.com/boardgames-epic-of-the-peloponnesian-war.htm</link>
	<description>All things military history!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:05:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald D. Swick</title>
		<link>http://www.armchairgeneral.com/boardgames-epic-of-the-peloponnesian-war.htm/comment-page-1#comment-30223</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald D. Swick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.armchairgeneral.com/articles.php?page=1&#038;p=3099#comment-30223</guid>
		<description>The publisher responds:

The latter is correct - battle continues with the attacking units at reduced morale (whatever it was), and the remaining defending units at their starting morale.

(Thus, in general, assaulting a city defended by a large stack of units isn&#039;t a good idea - better to siege the place and kill all the units in one blow when the city falls. Which is the reason it is generally NOT a good idea to defend a city with a large stack of units. There&#039;s little incentive for the attacker to actually assault the fortress if it&#039;s well defended, and conversely the stack of units provides no help in keeping the city from falling to a siege.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The publisher responds:</p>
<p>The latter is correct &#8211; battle continues with the attacking units at reduced morale (whatever it was), and the remaining defending units at their starting morale.</p>
<p>(Thus, in general, assaulting a city defended by a large stack of units isn&#8217;t a good idea &#8211; better to siege the place and kill all the units in one blow when the city falls. Which is the reason it is generally NOT a good idea to defend a city with a large stack of units. There&#8217;s little incentive for the attacker to actually assault the fortress if it&#8217;s well defended, and conversely the stack of units provides no help in keeping the city from falling to a siege.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.armchairgeneral.com/boardgames-epic-of-the-peloponnesian-war.htm/comment-page-1#comment-30064</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 07:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.armchairgeneral.com/articles.php?page=1&#038;p=3099#comment-30064</guid>
		<description>Could you please help me clarify what happens after a fortress is breached? Do all attacking units reset to their original morale? or do they remain reduced while the stacked units inside the fortress come in at full morale with the +1 small unfortified city bonus? This is driving me crazy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you please help me clarify what happens after a fortress is breached? Do all attacking units reset to their original morale? or do they remain reduced while the stacked units inside the fortress come in at full morale with the +1 small unfortified city bonus? This is driving me crazy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

