| |

21st Century LeadershipKevin Lee, USMC, ret. | December 09, 2007 | one comment | Print | E-mail Given that Marines who actually use the weapons and equipment in combat likely will be more knowledgeable than the unit leader must not make the leader feel intimidated and thereby provoke a defensive reaction. This is selfish pride that can only hurt the unit as a whole. I have witnessed commanders refusing to send their Marine subordinates to advanced technological schools due to the fear of their subordinates becoming more technically knowledgeable than they. This attitude only hurts the Corps and could even cause a unit to not accomplish its mission. It may also hamper morale once the Marines realize they are being held back for selfish reasons. For the overall good of the unit, commanders should strive to ensure their subordinates are as highly trained as possible.
Any type of additional training should be encouraged by the command. As equipment becomes obsolete at a faster rate than ever before, training for newer weapons and machinery must be expeditiously accomplished, whether it is by sending Marines to formal schooling or conducting classes within the unit (conducted by the unit’s most qualified person and taught with well-written lesson plans). If necessary, bring in someone from outside the unit to conduct the training. The most important point to remember is that leaders must take the initiative to ensure their Marines are properly trained on any new equipment and are fully prepared to operate it in combat. Any weapons and equipment that have become obsolete (and which are not sent back through the supply system) must be properly maintained in operational order, including maintaining all pertinent publications. The reason for this is that if the unit is called into combat, obsolete items could be used as ‘back-up’ gear. It has been virtually a tradition in the Corps to use outdated weapons and equipment, either under the pressure of combat requirements or in a unit’s training program. Just because it is obsolete does not mean it cannot be useful, and proficiency must be maintained “just in case.” Platoon and company commanders should create time to conduct localized training on all organic equipment, where all personnel will be involved. This might take the form of a Weapons Platoon conducting training on recent modifications of equipment or on a new type of weapon. Another example might be tank crews working with mechanics and re-training with new technology, or communications personnel trouble-shooting or updating modifications on their radios. It is up to unit leadership to ensure this takes place and is an inherent responsibility of command. [continued on next page] Pages: 1 2 3
|
|
|
|
||
What is Armchair General?Armchair General (ACG) and ACG online feature a unique, interactive editorial approach that invites the reader to decide the course of action in challenging historical scenarios, to step into the shoes of a battlefield commander. Leading historians and contributors lend integrity and credibility to this fresh presentation of historical and contemporary events. Armchair General is the INTERACTIVE history magazine where YOU COMMAND and decide the course of action! |
What We Write About
|
Our Other Magazines |
Weider History Network: HistoryNet | Armchair General | Once A Marine | Achtung Panzer! Copyright © 2004-2008 Armchair General L.L.C., All rights reserved. |
||
One Comment to “21st Century Leadership”
Hello. I am an old friend of Kevin Lee, the author of the above article. I have had a difficult time finding information on him, and whether he has returned home safely. Please forward my information to him, so that he can touch base if he so chooses. Thanks so much.
Melissa 312-399-6920
By Melissa Gorgei on Oct 6, 2008 at 3:20 pm